Le 30/09/2015 10:28, Craig Bradney a ?crit : >> see : http://bugs.scribus.net/view.php?id=13339 >> Can somebody explain me why this report has been closed ? > Because the content of the bug doesn't present any solution that I think is > workable that is better than what we have now.
MrB, can you explain this opinion ? I have the feeling that you dont understand my proposition. Amongst the propositions, i think the simplest and best also is to replace the misleading labels with : - Document settings - Default settings Its workable because it's a plain string change. And IMO it's better than what we have now because : - the word 'setting' in both entries points on the relationship between these actions - "Default settings" opens a dialog that enable to actually set default settings both for a new document and for some scribus features. This would help avoid the commonest misunderstanding and user feedback : ":-( i change this in the setting but document is not changed" because it makes it clear where to set what. JL
