> On 5 May 2017, at 22:51, JLuc <jluc at no-log.org> wrote: > > Le 04/05/2017 ? 13:18, Craig Bradney a ?crit : >>> On 4 May 2017, at 13:02, JLuc <jluc at no-log.org> wrote: >>> IMO, the old scribus-dedicated text format is not worth being updated >>> when there are quasi-universal formats today. >>> ale once began a markdown importer >>> https://github.com/aoloe/scribus-plugin-gettext-markdown >>> Such a goal is more future proof. > >> Supporting something like markdown would be nice, pity there is no standard >> though :( > > http://commonmark.org might fix that, isnt ?
Nopt, not really, its just another version that is still not a standard. It might be the right answer but its not the only Markdown answer sadly. There are other option but its not an easy choice. > >> I'm still looking around for a new format for Scribus documentation.... > > HTML ? > SLA ? HTML is painful.. too much manual syntax and editors make a horrible mess of it. SLA is more of an end format. I?m looking for a more basic format that can be processed into HTML, possibly into MediaWiki formatting, and into others (that could include SLA). Craig
