On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:24:53 -0800
"Jesse McGrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/27/06, Jesse McGrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/27/06, Alban Bedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:12:26 -0800
> > > "Jesse McGrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here's a patch to correct many of the strings in the compiler and
> > > > tools. Mostly these are spelling/punctuation/grammar, but I also fixed
> > > > the file extension in scc's usage message.
> > >
> > > Look good, but sadly the patch have been munged by the mailing system.
> > > Could you repost it as attachement ? I forgot to mention that in the
> > > other mail, my bad :/
> >
> > All right, here it is.
>
> Now that I'm looking at it again, here are a few more corrections I
> missed in read.c:
>
> line 1143 should read "Warning: we already have an EXCD\n"
> line 1152 should read "Warning: we already have an ENCD\n"
> line 1161 should read "Warning: we already have an NLSC\n"
I fixed those but you dont't need to worry much about read.c and
write.c. This is very old code i plan to remove. Basically it read
the scumm data and write it back. I used it to check my understanding
of the format. Nowadays only a few of these functions are usefull
and should simply be moved where they are relevant.
Albeu
_______________________________________________
ScummC-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/scummc-general
