I need to do it without those two small squares that "classic" mode prints at the top. The crossmark lines are OK.

So is there a way to accept pages that are insured by an operator to be fed with a particular consistent _rotational_ orientation and side? Evaluation of the corner crossmarks by sdaps can be used to insure that the boxes are in positional alignment on the page (by x and y...); but no barcodes and no small boxes in the corner.

And separately: can I edit questionnaire.sdaps after project setup, to reflect possibly new box locations??


On 9/22/2015 8:15 AM, Terrence Kovacs wrote:


I am using sdaps w/o the barcode with this documentclass line:


\documentclass[english,pagemark,stamp,final,letterpaper,no_print_survey_id,style=classic]{sdaps}


Corner marks are printed to orient the page.


Terrence Kovacs
Research Systems Engineer
Physics and Astronomy Department
Dartmouth College
Wilder 341, 603-646-9303


------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Steve <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 5:39 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [sdaps] Inspection of Page Number and Orientation... (#82)
This is sort of related to my previous page orientation question (which is not working yet; but let me bring this question to the fore...):

In sdaps.cls, there is a comment:

    /*% We unconditionally print this barcode; it is required for the
    recognition process...*/

And sure enough: if I comment out the bar code and attempt a scan, checkmarks don't get recognized (but note that I left the corner crossmarks from the stamp process in place...)

My question is: if I feed all my documents to be oriented in a uniformly consistent way (and perhaps even pass a hint to sdaps as to how they are oriented on the feeder?), can I get sdaps to recognize the checkmarks without the barcode?

An interrelated question: I see in questionnaire.sdaps that coordinates for the checkboxes get defined during the setup process. If I adjust the coordinates in this file, will a subsequent scan read from those new locations??


Reply via email to