Hi, sorry for not responding earlier.
I am unsure. In principle, there is nothing special about the SDAPS
package. What might be the case though is that they are still picking
up an old version of the package. I made some important compatibility
bugfixes for newer LaTeX versions which were only released on CTAN on
2021-11-11. Basically, some versions of TeXLive are simply broken.
What I can see is that they are picking up a version before 1.9.8 right
now. Unfortunately, there are no proper logs, but from the onwards
there is a SDAPSVersion= tag in the generated .sdaps file, and I am not
getting that.
Now, the error message actually says:
! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> \vbox_unpack_clear:N
\l_tmpa_box
l.72 \markline{ease of use}
{hard}{easy}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
So yes, too old SDAPS version. You'll need to use a newer versions,
i.e. add the files manually or wait until overleaf updates to a newer
TeXLive version.
Benjamin
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 09:27 -0700, Devan McGranahan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have insight into using the sdapsclassic document class
> on overleaf.com? I've forked the github repo and have successfully
> compiled locally the example.tex and a new questionnaire .tex file,
> but having pushed the changes to my fork and synced to a project on
> overleaf, the questions do not appear in the output window. The error
> pane suggests the compiler doesn't recognize the question-line
> commands (\markline{}, etc) as if a package was not called with
> \usepackage{}. Perhaps the overleaf TeX distribution doesn't have a
> current version of sdapsclassic?
>
> Any advice is appreciated.
>
> Devan McGranahan
> DevanMcGranahan.science
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
