My command line option is most common "-mz80 -c --codeseg CODE". I will check details asm difference tomorrow.
Woody AR1688 and PA1688 based IP phone mailing list -- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pa1688/ VOIP and AR1688 BLOG -- http://aredfox.spaces.live.com/ MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Klaus Krause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Development chatter about sdcc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:35 AM Subject: Re: [sdcc-devel] SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lin Rongrong schrieb: >> Just tested the Z80 port of release candidate 1, no obvious bug found so >> far, but I noticed a 2%-5% increase in code size comparing with 2.7.0. >> > > Can you provide some code samples where the code size increase is most > noticeable, along with the generated .asm files from both 2.7.0 and > 2.8.0 RC1? What are the command line options you used? > > Philipp > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFH1C3dbtUV+xsoLpoRAhZrAKCMtmvWCf29fMd5no+YgU2rf42CLgCgvm7g > RoW7QscppXcZQEupYpYUerE= > =NXlj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
