My point is that RTLs are "compiler internals", and some compilers
don't use them at all. High-level language translators (what f2c is)
simply translate one language into another...they are not compilers
per se.
-Dave
On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Andrey Vlassov wrote:
> Dave,
>
> it was a time when p2c/f2c was only an option for gcc
>
> http://directory.fsf.org/project/p2c/
> http://www.netlib.org/f2c/f2c.1
>
> Andrey
>
>
> Dave McGuire wrote:
>
>> On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Andrey Vlassov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, I am not completely sure and it might be that you right
>>> that "C"
>>> is not "RTL" any more as it was years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> "C" was never "RTL". C has always been C. Various RTLs have come
>> and gone as needed, typically as intermediary steps in compilation.
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Sdcc-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
