Raphael, sorry, I misunderstood where the problem is. So it is my fault!
Is this a general problem or it happens only with a specific source code? It is strange that it seems everything OK on other platforms - regression test pass. And everything is OK if I compile sdcc on my win32 cygming box too. I didn't try to run tests on the snapshot package... Borut Raphael Neider wrote: > Dear Borut, > > >>> I suppose that the problem was introduced in revision 5439 with >>> "src/pic16/gen.c (genNearPointerGet): fix double indirect access to >>> bitfields (#2782405)", so I can probably remove build 5432. Please >>> confirm if I can remove it. >>> >> I meant to remove revision 5436, not 5432... >> > > That's a definite no! Snapshots r5436 and r5441 work fine, > r5444 breaks in sdcpp (the preprocessor): Its output is empty!!! > Try "sdcpp test.c" with r5441 and compare it to r5444. > > As I see it, the upgrade to gcc cpp 4.4.0 broke things. > This can also be concluded from Kevins initial report, > though on my WinXP-box, windows does not complain about > sdcpp.exe encountering problems as with Kevin. Strange ... > > BTW: Kevin compiled for the default target, which is the 8051. > The pic16 backend is not involved at all (probably no backend is: > sdcc should error out in the frontend due to no tokens seen on end > of file). > > >>> Done, snapshots stored in (sdcc-snapshot-20090427) folder at the end of >>> http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php page. >>> > > Thanks a lot. > > >>> I copied both 5436 and 5438 revisions. >>> I suppose that the problem was introduced in revision 5439 with >>> "src/pic16/gen.c (genNearPointerGet): fix double indirect access to >>> bitfields (#2782405)", so I can probably remove build 5432. Please >>> confirm if I can remove it. >>> >>> I thing that it would be better solution to revert the fix of >>> #2782405 until the proper solution is found. >>> > > Nope, the proper solution is to fix the MinGW build of GCC CPP 4.4.0. > As a temporary fix, I would propose to revert r5444. > > I do not want to just put the blame on you -- I really appreciate > your effort in actively maintaining the preprocessor branch. This > time, however, some "interesting" problems seem to have crept in ... > > Best regards, > Raphael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations > Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of > expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry > leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf > and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
