On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Roel Adriaans wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:33:29PM -0300, Marcos Chaparro wrote:
>>
>> A few mates didn't use sdcc just because it lacks some libraries like this :(
>>
>
> I've been thinking that a site with diferent libraries for SDCC would be a
> nice idea. Need to have a bit of quality control, and the diferent
> architectures probably need diferent hardware files. But, a collection of
> some (hardware)-libs would be nice.
>
> That we we don't have bother the compiler people with this sort of
> thing, would be a nice comunity driven site.

I've been using AVR proccessors recently - mostly via the Arduino platform 
and they do seem to have quite a good community resource going for them, 
however, in Aruino-land, everything is fairly well defined and I fear that 
the number and variety of processors supported here might not make that 
possible...

And in that world, I've actually ended up re-writing everything of theirs 
to work in my world.... There's some shockingly bad code out there )-: but 
it was nice to have some templates to work from.

Gordon



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to