I have noticed that Philipp used _Bool in his own project, so I tried it with my own. To my surprise, after I added --std-c99 option, change BOOLEAN from "unsigned char" to "_Bool", I found code size generally get larger as below:
code0 data code1 code2 code3 code4 code5 code6 code7 code 1D5B 19C4 456D 4F9C 4742 50AD 53F1 4354 5571 1B64 // gp2266 sip 0.49.022, without --std-c99, or BOOLEAN as "unsigned char" with --std-c99, they generated the same result 1D76 19C4 4610 4FD4 47A7 50B9 542D 4354 55A6 1B67 // gp2266 sip 0.49.023, with --std-c99 and BOOLEAN as "_Bool" I am willing to get faster speed with more code size, should I keep --std-c99 option and use BOOLEAN as _Bool? Woody http://palmmicro.com/woody/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
