On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 9:09 PM Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do SDCC users have a preference? If yes, why?
My preference is to always go the gcc/clang road, according to the
Principle of Least Astonishment.
So, what do gcc and clang do (since they are the mainstream compilers
that everyone is usually starting with) ?
> Do any SDCC users currently rely on "plain int" (either directly, via
> typedef or typeof) bit-fields being unsigned in SDCC? How much would it
> inconvenience you if the next version of SDCC made "plain int"
> bit-fields signed?
An option to choose signedness, coupled with changing the default
would be awesome in my opinion.
That said, I wasn't aware of it, so I guess the change won't affect me
as much as others.
--
Steve Schnepp
"A man is not dead while his name is still spoken."
-- T. Pratchett - Going Postal, Chapter 4 prologue
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
