Please excuse my luddite question but, why would anyone do any of that? Some
kind of syntactical thing perhaps?
--
Michael A Hawkins
Woodbury, CT 06798 USA
Mobile: 203-550-5502
On Wed, 2025-10-22 at 19:06 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> SDCC currently allows qualified (unless by a storage-class qualifier)
> and named void parameters:
>
> int g(register void);
> int h(volatile void);
> int i(const void);
> int j(void x);
> int j(void x) { return 0;}
>
> This is undefined behavior in C up to C23, but a constraint violation in
> C2y. Is anyone using any of these? If not, I'd just make this an error.
>
> Philipp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sdcc-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
