On 21. feb.. 2008, at 22.00, Damien POBEL wrote: [snip]
> I don't have a solution. > But don't you think it's too confusing to have "autoload" and > "autoloads" directories to permit a "not nice" code ? > In fact the real problem is the name of the "autoloads" directory > which > is not well choosen for a directory where you can write template > operators. I agree with you, "autoloads" isn't an ideal moniker for template operators. However, I think it is best to stick with that, until the new template engine is integrated, at which point, this name should also be changed. -- Best regards, Ole Marius -- Sdk-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/sdk-public
