2010/6/25 André Rømcke <[email protected]> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:56 PM, André Rømcke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Key Value store on the other hand can be used for other things, memory >> variants for caching, and persistent variants for instance as an alternative >> nfs cluster handler for instance (Cluster handler can already use different >> DB as Bertrand mentioned on today eZ Conference talk, and the tables have a >> simple key / value structure). >> >> > Ignore, mixed with ezdbfile_data, ezdfsfile is more complex so will > probably not be possible in a pure KV, but maybe using any of the hybrids > (Cassandra? but probably issue with it's eventually consistence nature > though). > Nope, ezdfsfile table has the exact same structure as the ezdbfile one. So a key/pair based cache would work here. We just have a few sync issues that * have* to be considered (TTL of items, expiry delay, etc).
There is an 'oops' from me here though, I have to confess: I probably read the initial email too late at night (okay, 21:03. I was drunk, I guess), and checked too quickly what KV Stores was exactly. But in any case, it has triggered an interesting discussion about both topics :-) -- Bertrand
-- Sdk-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/sdk-public
