Actually it really would be a better way to go straight with SQL.
Forget what I said about ORM :)

On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Steven Fines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> An even better solution would be to take advantage of mysql's selective
> replication feature. It'll be more complicated to set up, but if you're
> going to move a lot of rows on a regular basis and need the data moved
> now(tm) it'd be the way to go.
> If this is a one-off or once a year type task, I'd follow Mr. Bresnik's
> advice and use straight SQL.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:33 PM, John Bresnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You should straight sql for this..  basically an insert statement with an
>> encapsulated select, doing with AR would be real expensive..
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2008 1:38 PM, "liquid_rails" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks, but I don't even know how to write the script or the code for
>> moving the records.  Do you know of any websites or books that could
>> show me how to do this?
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Dec 5, 11:34 am, Phlip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Bresnik
>> wrote: > > Put the code for m...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>


-- 
Att,
- Caike

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to