Like Matt says, if the plugins you are planning on using are updated, then Rails3 is a good choice. However, I recently started a project using Rails3/Ruby1.9/Ubuntu9.10, and I spent a lot of time shaving yaks, mainly with issues related to Ruby1.9. Backing down to Ruby1.8.7 seemed to go a lot smoother.
Regards, John Lynch, CTO Rigel Group, LLC [email protected] On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]>wrote: > Plugins might be an issue if they hack into Rails' internals, otherwise, > Rails3 beta is ok when starting new projects. A new beta should hit the > interwebs shortly if everything goes according to plan. > > Matt plugins/gems were you planning on using? > > Also, make sure to switch to Rub 1.8.7 or even better Ruby 1.9, 1.9.2 final > should be released in August according to the release schedule. > > - Matt > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Kevin Baker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> We have a couple Rails app coming up that I'd like to jump into Rails 3 >> with. >> >> What is the consensus on Rails3 production readiness? They are pretty >> standard CRUD apps with some pretty standard plugins? >> >> >> >> ---- >> Kevin Baker >> Sr Software Engineer >> Sorenson Media >> >> -- >> SD Ruby mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
