On this note, has anyone done a talk on Service-Oriented Architecture? I know it's a thing, and I like the idea of it, but I don't have very much real experience with it. I'd be interested in hearing about the pros, cons, and implementation details of doing a full app with SOA in Rails.
Ian On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Ben Hughes <m...@benhughes.name> wrote: > Matt hits on an important point - we're talking about Rails here, yet Ruby > as a language is still wonderfully powerful within the ecosystem of > alternatives. I don't think the value of building things in Ruby and > quasi-Ruby (CoffeeScript ;-) has waned at all. We may just be building > different things and architecting things differently. > > Ben > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Matt Aimonetti > <mattaimone...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I mostly agree with the article. But it will take a little bit before >> everybody's on the same page. >> Rails for me is yet another tool in my toolbox when I need to create "web >> 2.0" site, mainly dynamically generated on the server side. >> >> The one thing tho, even when I try hard, I almost always come back to >> Ruby even when working in a Ruby/Scala shop and having a thing for Lisp and >> Go. >> >> - Matt >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Chris McCann <testflyj...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> An interesting post about where Rails fits in with the current web- >>> enabled application landscape. >>> >>> http://broadcastingadam.com/2011/11/moving_on_from_rails >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> -- >>> SD Ruby mailing list >>> sdruby@googlegroups.com >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby >> >> >> -- >> SD Ruby mailing list >> sdruby@googlegroups.com >> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby >> > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > sdruby@googlegroups.com > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list sdruby@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
