Matt,  

I ran puma under jRuby (1.7.3 with 1.9 compatibility mode), not MRI. Do you 
expect the performance under MRI 1.9 and 2.0 would be much different?

As far as the app: I just created the most basic app I could think of: Single 
model, 2 fields on the model. The endpoint hit was reading 10 records from the 
database and rendering them to html in an scaffold-created index action. On 
rails 4.0.0rc1

As far as memory: I didn't actually record any memory consumption: I just kept 
an eye on top for the processes. In unicorns case, I added the main process 
plus the child processes memory consumption. Puma peaked at 405Mb, unicorn at 
496Mb. 

Thanks for the comments, 

-- 
Ylan Segal
[email protected]


On Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:

> Agreed, I would have also loved to see the results of using 1.9.3/2.0 with 
> Puma, as well as memory consumption differences and a bit more information 
> about the benchmarked app :)
> On May 23, 2013 3:33 AM, "bradleyland" <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> > It's always great to have more points of data to consider when comparing 
> > app servers. One little thing though, there are no legends for the graphs, 
> > so it's unclear which is which until you start reading after the graph
> > 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:06:51 PM UTC-4, Ylan Segal wrote:
> > > Hi Clark, 
> > > 
> > > I did some more playing around with unicorn and puma. This time I used 
> > > jRuby for puma and it's performance was really sweet. I tested locally 
> > > with a test application, so YMMV: 
> > > 
> > > http://ylan.segal-family.com/blog/2013/05/20/unicorn-vs-puma-redux/
> > -- 
> > -- 
> > SD Ruby mailing list
> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
> > --- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "SD Ruby" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected] 
> > (mailto:sdruby%[email protected]).
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> SD Ruby mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SD 
> Ruby" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 



-- 
-- 
SD Ruby mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SD 
Ruby" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to