Some of Twitter is still Rails, so it does count. (And I do think they are running Rails via jruby.)
But Rails is now only just one piece of the hugely scalable stack that powers Twitter. -- Patrick On Aug 25, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Benjamin Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > not sure if i'd consider twitter to be a rails site anymore. > https://blog.twitter.com/2013/new-tweets-per-second-record-and-how > > "It wasn’t going to be easy to get our performance, reliability, and > efficiency goals out of the Ruby VM, so we embarked on writing code to be run > on the JVM instead" (not sure if this means jruby in jvm, but my guess is > not). > > evident with a lot of their opensourced projects. eg. finagle, cascading, etc. > > On Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:56:16 PM UTC-7, Chris McCann wrote: >> >> In case anyone's wondering, here's a list of the top 10 web sites built with >> Ruby on Rails. I've not vetted this info, just relaying it: >> >> http://blog.netguru.co/post/58995145341/top-10-sites-built-with-ruby-on-rails >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris > > -- > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SD > Ruby" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SD Ruby" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
