On Feb 11, 2015, at 12:13 , Adam + Cuppy <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been writing "east facing code" for a while and it's a fantastic way to > go. It definitely encourages a expectation focused pattern.
Okay, but pure functional code is also a great way to go, yet I can't do both. Or maybe I can have a world of functions over there, and a world of objects over here, and the objects use the functions but are eastward in their relations to each other? I'm thinking the compromise is to do as much as I reasonably can using pure functions, and to constrain my side-effecting stuff to eastwardly-composed objects. -- -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SD Ruby" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
