On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Kevin O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure which scheme makes the most sense. I could see using the > "cirrus" scheme - each hardware type defines its own "handle_10" and > "vga_post" in a file dedicated to that hardware, which then check for > hardware specific functions and call "library" code for the standard > stuff. However, I'm not sure how much code duplication there would be > for things like the VBE calls which seem to contain a mix of standard > info and hardware specific info. >
Happy new year, I havn't studied the cirrus code yet, but the part which implements the VBE interface should be quite simillar from one driver to another, so I don't think it is necessary to let every hardware type redefine its own int10 handler, at least for the vesa part. Julian. _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
