"Kevin O'Connor" <ke...@koconnor.net> writes: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> > I also wonder if the ":rom%d" stuff in bootprio_find_*_rom() should >> > also be made hex just for consistency (though it seems unlikely a >> > single rom would ever have more than 10 drives on it). >> >> I don't know. QEMU never generates a ":NUMBER" suffix, and I haven't >> found a specification for this device path. > > It isn't part of a spec and I don't think QEMU ever used it. Now that > I think about it, I believe I added it to make sure multiple BCV > declarations in a rom could be uniquely identified and wouldn't be > confused with each other during pattern matching. So, a change to %x > would purely be for consistency. > > I'll put up a separate patch for it.
Makes sense, as everything else is hexadecimal. _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios