On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:11:14PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 12/29/2015 07:17 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > >The callers interested in the return status of build_and_send_cmd() > >are only interested in the command return code status (returnCode) and > >not the status of the message transmission (rc). Simplify the callers > >by returning returnCode directly instead of via a pointer parameter. > >For the unlikely case that the command transmission fails, return -1 > >to signal the failure to the callers. > > > >Signed-off-by: Kevin O'Connor <ke...@koconnor.net> > > I looked through all of the patches. I tested them (with the bug fixed) and > from what I can see it still behaves the same way as before. So please, > apply them. Any more changes coming from you ?
Thanks. I was looking at a couple of minor changes (mostly reducing redundant dprintf). Nothing important. I pushed my work tree to: https://github.com/KevinOConnor/seabios/tree/testing Did you have patches pending? -Kevin _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
