On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:12:33PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 09:43 -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 01:07:45PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > For CSM, the highest priority for a boot entry is zero. SeaBIOS doesn't > > > use zero, and the highest priority is 1. > > > > FYI, SeaBIOS does treat zero as the highest priority. And a negative > > priority means "use default priority". > > > > I'm fine with the change, though. > > I don't think find_prio ever returns zero. > > dprintf(1, "Searching bootorder for: %s\n", glob); > int i; > for (i = 0; i < BootorderCount; i++) > if (glob_prefix(glob, Bootorder[i])) > return i+1; > return -1;
True, but interactive_bootmenu() sets the priority to zero if the device is selected. (I'm guessing find_prio() returned 1+ just to avoid confusion with interactive_bootmenu().) In any case, I'm fine with your change. -Kevin _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org
