Hi,

> > IMHO this must be fixed in vhost-user-scsi no matter what.  Host
> > processes crashing in case the guest doesn't behave as expected
> > is a security problem.
> Yes, the backend should be fixed.
> However, we may as well initialize these two vqs, because other virtio
> frontend drivers have implemented these
> as I know. It's good for compatibility.

Is this required by the virtio spec?  I don't think so.

> This crash is that some vring(controlq, eventq) aren't initialized
> done from vhost-user aspect.
>  And spdk/dpdk handles incoming events from theses queues, but the
> vhost-user device isn't RUNNING
>  status, becase some vqs are not ready, so the destruction is bad.

The device should look at the status bits.

https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.1/csprd01/virtio-v1.1-csprd01.html#x1-930001

When the driver sets DRIVER_OK it is done setting up virtqueues.
When some of them are not ready the driver apparently doesn't want
use them.

> BTW, do you accept a future patch that implements the virtio SCSI hotplug?

Well, the problem with hotplug is that the BIOS interfaces have been
created in the 1980-ies and are not designed with hotplug in mind.  So
retrofitting hotplug support into that is a rather hard problem and the
benefits are questionable given that the BIOS typically runs only for a
very short time, before the real operating system takes over control.

take care,
  Gerd

_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org
To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-le...@seabios.org

Reply via email to