Author: manaRH
Date: 2012-08-14 14:29:43 -0400 (Tue, 14 Aug 2012)
New Revision: 15042
Modified:
branches/community/Seam_2_3/seam-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/jboss/seam/test/integration/FactoryLockTest.java
Log:
fixed typos in comments
Modified:
branches/community/Seam_2_3/seam-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/jboss/seam/test/integration/FactoryLockTest.java
===================================================================
---
branches/community/Seam_2_3/seam-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/jboss/seam/test/integration/FactoryLockTest.java
2012-08-14 18:09:24 UTC (rev 15041)
+++
branches/community/Seam_2_3/seam-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/jboss/seam/test/integration/FactoryLockTest.java
2012-08-14 18:29:43 UTC (rev 15042)
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
// This test is the same as factoryLock test, except it uses the same
factory in both threads.
@Test
- @Ignore // this is weird usecase so we don't test it as we know it doesn't
work
+ @Ignore // this is weird use case so we don't test it as we know it doesn't
work due SFSB doesn't serve for multithread request from same client
public void sameFactoryLock()
throws Exception
{
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
});
}
- // This test is the same as sameFactoryLock test, except it uses a
@Syncrhonized Seam component, instead of an SFSB
+ // This test is the same as sameFactoryLock test, except it uses a
@Synchronized Seam component, instead of an SFSB
@Test
public void seamSynchronizedFactoryLock()
throws Exception
_______________________________________________
seam-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-commits
