Thanks for the feedback. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Pete Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 6 Jul 2010, at 13:31, Dan Allen wrote: > > > Stuart also suggested renaming modules to trunk, or as I suggested making > a SVN-style symlink using svn:externals. The purpose would be to make it > more obvious to people what to checkout. > > > > /trunk -> /modules > > No. This is completely counterintuitive and breaks all conventions around > SVN. > Okay. I agree. > > I'd like to nuke the following directories from the Seam repo, which I > don't believe are currently being used. > > > > http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/seam/trunk/ (each component has it's own > trunk in Seam 3, so this trunk is erroneous; all Seam 2 stuff is under a > branch) > > http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/seam/seam-gen/ (the real encore is in > /sandbox) > > Agreed. > Cool. > > > > > I would like to consolidate /build and /dist under a single folder. They > are both build/packaging related and I think they should be seen as a single > top-level unit. They are this way in Weld. > > No. These need to remain separate, they have different release cycles and > thus different trunk, branch, tag. > I'm assuming that's because the idea of a dist in Seam 3 is much different than that of Weld. So the dist needs to be a separate entity. I'll include your points in the readme. -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
