On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Stuart Douglas <[email protected]>wrote:
> Does anyone have any objection to adding a complete set of > AnnotationLiterals for all CDI annotations into weld-extensions? > I remember suggesting (or thinking that) at one point, so I'm for it. Though I believe Pete said that this should be in a spec rev, that any annotation (that would be referenced as a literal) should also define it's literals. That was an approach Seam has started to take, I think. -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
