+1 for exceptionhandling.* On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nicklas Karlsson <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 for exception. * > > No extra.hierarchy.levels > > On 7/9/10, Jason Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > > In IRC (last week I think) we talked about needing a name for the > > exception handling module (and also package name). It sounded like > > Exceptions was probably the winner in IRC, though we were a little > > torn on package naming (o.j.s.exception, o.j.s.exception.handling, > > etc). Tossing this out there for more ideas, or some sort of > > consensus. > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > > > Software Engineer > > Open Source Advocate > > > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > > _______________________________________________ > > seam-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > --- > Nik > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > -- Jordan Ganoff
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
