It's been brought to my attention that we have additional issues with Solder in Glassfish besides the problem with loading extensions without a beans.xml. We will not be releasing the beta without addressing these first, as a Seam that doesn't work in Glassfish won't be looked upon very positively by the community.
On 19/01/11 01:17, Jason Porter wrote: > Yeah, but I really think we need to address Solder in Glassfish before > we release. If not for this, then at the bare minimum for final, but > better to get it done sooner than later. > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:53, Shane Bryzak<[email protected]> wrote: >> Are the fixes you need in Solder already present in the trunk? If so, I can >> get a release out for you tomorrow. >> >> On 18/01/11 09:49, Jason Porter wrote: >>> I need a Solder release (I'm working on switching to beans.xml), then >>> I can release the alpha, and a beta quickly for Catch, or we could >>> still keep it at alpha. Though because it's such an integrated piece >>> ideally it should be beta. >>> >>> I think we should all be using the next release of solder if we can >>> make sure it works on Glassfish 3.0.1. I'll send a follow-up email >>> with my latest exception. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:09, Shane Bryzak<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Also I forgot to mention, if you have any examples packaged with your >>>> module and they use the XML config module for configuration, can you >>>> please ensure that they're using the latest version (it should actually >>>> be using the one specified in the Seam BOM) and that all the tags are up >>>> to date, as we've gone through a few naming changes. >>>> >>>> On 17/01/11 21:06, Shane Bryzak wrote: >>>>> Hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> I just wanted to check in with everyone to make sure we're all still on >>>>> track for the beta release this week. If your module is still in alpha, >>>>> then ideally it would be nice if your updates for the beta release are >>>>> completed by Wednesday, which will give us enough time to perform a beta >>>>> release for your module (I can do the actual release for you) and then >>>>> have enough time to incorporate it into the overall Seam distribution. >>>>> >>>>> From all the feedback that we received it looks like this shouldn't be >>>>> a problem, however if you've come across any last minute hiccups please >>>>> let us know and we'll try to get you the help you need. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Shane >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
