What about discussing this point with CDIDource ? Their code could be a good base. I asked Rick if I could use it and he seemed to be very open on the subject... I could do it, except I need time to work on... a given JSR in which I'm supposed to be involved ;-).
Antoine 2011/6/29 Pete Muir <[email protected]> > It has been discussed multiple times, but it was never delivered on. I set > it as a requirement for Seam 3.1 when I handed over to Shane, but not sure > what has happened since. > > On 29 Jun 2011, at 15:18, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: > > > Your smiley suggest that this has been already discussed / decided. I > missed those discussion apparently. Sorry... > > > > Antoine > > > > 2011/6/29 Pete Muir <[email protected]> > > Yes, we should do this :-) > > > > Marius is the owner. > > > > On 29 Jun 2011, at 14:28, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > 3 weeks ago I started a consulting mission in a big Insurance company > that is Redhat / JBoss customer. They use most of Java EE 5 implementation > provided by JBoss 5 EAP except for EJB 3. No EJB because it's also a Spring > Shop. One of my missions is to help them to build their next official stack > based on JBoss EAP 6 (which should be out in January). So I try to promote > full Java EE 6 stack (with CDI and EJB 3.1) and put Spring aside as an > alternative/Legacy framework. But it won't work if they don't have a > supported solution to use their old Spring components / Knowledge in this > new stack. > > > More globally one big objection I encounter very often with the > adoption of CDI (at least in France) is investment done in Spring. So if we > want to facilitate the adoption we have to provide a Bridge with Spring to > allow devs to integrate the "de facto standard" in the "official standard". > > > I know that Rick Hightower and CDISource Team wrote a nice extension on > the subject (https://github.com/CDISource/cdisource) but I think such a > module should be endorsed by a company that'll provide support on it like > RH. > > > Seam 2 provided this Bridge so it seems normal to provide it as well in > Seam 3. > > > What is your opinion ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Antoine Sabot-Durand > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > seam-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Antoine Sabot-Durand > > Manager technique > > ------------------------------- > > Ippon Technologies > > 3, rue Bellanger > > 92300 Levallois Perret > > t. 01.46.12.48.48 > > f. 01.46.12.48.49 > > p. 06.08.55.34.26 > > e. [email protected] > > www.ippon.fr > > -- Antoine Sabot-Durand Manager technique ------------------------------- Ippon Technologies 3, rue Bellanger 92300 Levallois Perret t. 01.46.12.48.48 f. 01.46.12.48.49 p. 06.08.55.34.26 e. [email protected] www.ippon.fr
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
