On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 22:27, Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another thing to add to the agenda which we need to discuss is dependency > scopes. In particular, we need to review our previous decision to make the > implementation component of a module runtime-scoped, in light of the fact > that we now no longer have combined jars. > Isn't the idea of having an API and implementation split is that you should not be compiling against anything in the implementation? Of course, an end user can choose to override that convention to make the implementation a compile-time scope, but we don't want to encourage that, do we? -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
