On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 13:09, Dan Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 20:56, Jason Porter <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Aug 17, 2011, at 18:46, Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I've done some work to seam-parent already, removing weld-parent from >> > the hierarchy, updating all the plugin versions and some general >> > cleanup. I have a bunch of questions though, if anyone can answer any >> > of these it will save me a lot of time: >> > >> > 1) Do we require both junit and testng? >> >> I think most are using JUnit. I found ftests that use testng though. >> > > That will go away when we switch to Arquillian Drone. The precursor to > Drone was bound to (or worked more comfortably) with testng. That's not the > case any longer. > > JUnit is a much better choice with Arquillian, atm. The intention is to > have an equal experience with both, but we are still facing some SPI > challenges w/ TestNG. > > Sadly, that knocks out groups. However, we have plans to put a filtering > feature at a higher level, in Arquillian itself. > I don't really like how JUnit is doing groups, but they do have a comparable feature now called Categories. I think I can actually say JUnit is moving forward now (maybe not in a direction we agree with) and TestNG is staying rather stagnant. > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > > -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
