Is it possible to add a source directory or test directory?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 20, 2011, at 15:36, Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> wrote:

> Unfortunately that doesn't work - the issue occurs when the artifacts being 
> unpacked are in the same reactor.  See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-98
> 
> On 21/08/11 01:11, Ken Finnigan wrote:
>> 
>> If I'm not mistaken, that error is resolved by installing the artifacts.
>> 
>> The problem is that it doesn't know how to unpack a directory, so the jar 
>> with the test classes needs to be installed for it to work
>> 
>> Ken
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:02, Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I've made some progress in this area, so far I've created a few of the 
>>> container boms in seam-parent and also started converting the Solder tests 
>>> to use the new structure.
>>> 
>>> I have run into one issue though - when running the tests I'm encountering 
>>> the error below.  The reason it hasn't manifested in the International 
>>> module is because there was a version mismatch between some of the test 
>>> suite artifacts, however if you synchronize them all you get the same error.
>>> 
>>> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>>> [INFO] 
>>> [INFO] Seam International Test Suite: Aggregator ......... SUCCESS [1.224s]
>>> [INFO] Seam Container BOMs Aggregator .................... SUCCESS [0.025s]
>>> [INFO] Weld EE Embedded 1.1 Container .................... SUCCESS [0.899s]
>>> [INFO] JBoss AS7 Managed Container ....................... SUCCESS [2.722s]
>>> [INFO] Seam International Test Suite Common .............. SUCCESS [0.376s]
>>> [INFO] Seam International Test Suite: Internals Integration Tests  SUCCESS 
>>> [0.013s]
>>> [INFO] Seam International Test Suite: Internals Integration Tests Base  
>>> SUCCESS [0.743s]
>>> [INFO] Seam International Test Suite: Internals Integration Tests for JBoss 
>>> AS  FAILURE [2.529s]
>>> [INFO] Seam International Test Suite: Internals Integration Tests for Weld 
>>> EE Embedded  SKIPPED
>>> [INFO] 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>> [INFO] 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] Total time: 9.393s
>>> [INFO] Finished at: Sun Aug 21 00:55:38 EST 2011
>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 25M/348M
>>> [INFO] 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.1:unpack 
>>> (unpack-base-tests) on project 
>>> seam-international-testsuite-integration-internals-jbossas: Error unpacking 
>>> file: 
>>> /home/shane/project/seam/international/testsuite/internals/base/target/classes
>>>  to: 
>>> /home/shane/project/seam/international/testsuite/internals/jbossas/target/test-classes
>>> [ERROR] org.codehaus.plexus.archiver.ArchiverException: The source must not 
>>> be a directory.
>>> [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I've spent a little time trying to find a workaround but it seems that this 
>>> has been a known bug in Maven for at least 4 years.  If anyone wants to 
>>> take a look at this and try to figure out a workaround in the meantime 
>>> please be my guest.
>>> 
>>> Shane
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 30/07/11 12:16, Ken Finnigan wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> I've committed the work on the Arquillian testsuite infrastructure on the 
>>>> i18n module which can be found here: 
>>>> https://github.com/seam/international/tree/develop/testsuite
>>>> 
>>>> Here are some notes on how it's structured and what needs to be done:
>>>> 
>>>> API and Impl modules still retain unit tests that don't require container 
>>>> testing
>>>> testsuite/common includes Deployment and Library helpers and anything that 
>>>> would be common to multiple types of testsuites, such as internals, smoke, 
>>>> etc
>>>> The helpers from this module could potentially be pulled up into a common 
>>>> module for all, but that may introduce complexity in trying to use it in 
>>>> each module so may be best to leave it there for the moment and see how it 
>>>> goes
>>>> testsuite/container-boms contains the container definition for weld ee 
>>>> embedded and AS7.  Others can be found at 
>>>> https://github.com/mojavelinux/arquillian-showcase/tree/master/container-boms
>>>> One of the first things that needs to happen is these container-boms need 
>>>> to be created in a seam parent module of some kind such that each module 
>>>> can utilize them without having to replicate the content directly
>>>> testsuite/internals/base contains the test classes that used to be within 
>>>> impl.  For i18n I was able to leave the entirety of the test classes in 
>>>> the bases module and simply explode it into the target/test-classes 
>>>> directory of the testsuite/internals/${container} modules as part of the 
>>>> integration-test phase.
>>>> To make it easier to then explode the jar built from this module into sub 
>>>> modules, the test classes and resources actually need to be in src/main.  
>>>> As we don't plan using the jar built from this for anything other than 
>>>> testing it's not an issue.
>>>> container tests are only activated on the integration-test phase and 
>>>> skipped on the basic test phase
>>>> https://github.com/seam/international/blob/develop/testsuite/README.md 
>>>> outlines all the proposed types of suites that testsuite can contain.  I 
>>>> believe an initial first step should be to move the existing container 
>>>> tests, or create some, for the internals module.  Over time we can then 
>>>> look to flesh out the testsuite with additional types such as smoke, 
>>>> cluster, api, etc
>>>> One area that I haven't looked at yet is code coverage given that the 
>>>> tests are further spread than previously.  I'm hoping that it will be 
>>>> relatively easy to amalgamate all the coverage data to produce a single 
>>>> report.
>>>> Any questions about this please let me know.
>>>> 
>>>> Ken
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Reply via email to