That's a good idea too Stuart. Can we easily make use of something similar for 
EntityHome, or do you think we have something easy enough with what I posted. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 20, 2011, at 20:15, Stuart Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:

> My original plan for EntityQuery was to use the ServiceHandler stuff in 
> solder:
> 
> @EntityQuery
> public interface MyQuery {
> 
>   @Query("Select u from User u where type=:p1")
>   public List<User> users(String type);
> 
> }
> 
> Stuart
> 
> On 09/21/2011 06:00 AM, José Rodolfo Freitas wrote:
>> 
>> Yeah, I agree that being declarative is the ideal.
>> let's say no to inheritance with generics! hehehe.
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Dan Allen <[email protected]>           
>> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:36, José Rodolfo Freitas 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> What I like most in CDI and Seam3 is that it's very easy to keep things 
>> simple and that's something I strongly advocate. 
>> 
>> +1
>>  
>> Of course there're still boilerplate code, but I think it's minimal 
>> (compared to the JEE generations before), and that's something forge can 
>> create without the need to satisfy a "framework". Yes, I admitedly am afraid 
>> of that word.
>> 
>> That's fine, it doesn't have to be a framework. I do think there is room for 
>> having some common scaffolding, though. If we can do that by extending the 
>> programming model (annotations, generic beans or interfaces) so that it's 
>> declarative, that's probably ideal.
>> 
>> I suggest that we brainstorm proposals using gists (http://gist.github.com). 
>> That will get the ball rolling. We can start with the idea Jason posted, or 
>> feel free to take a different approach.
>> 
>> -Dan
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>> 
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
>> http://mojavelinux.com
>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Reply via email to