Additionnal thoughts :

As I understand ViewConfigStore for now, any extension can use ViewConfigStore 
to store about any metadata (event if it's limited to Annotation for the 
moment).
So this is great for additionnal features.

If we go for solution 4, Page/View will be typed and future extensions will be 
limited.
We can however add a metadatas field in Page/View for extensions to store about 
anything in a view.

IMO, solution 4 would make the code easier to understand (more typed) - but 
breaks a lot of code, and since I'm a newbie here...


________________________________
De : Adrian Gonzalez <[email protected]>
À : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Jeudi 27 Octobre 2011 17h44
Objet : [seam-dev] SEAMFACES-147 viewActions

Hello,

I'm working a bit on this issue.

But I'm stuck now and would like to know the better way to continue (sorry to 
bother once more ;( ).

For the moment I've :
1. registered all viewActionBindings into the viewConfigStore.
2. more or less replicated SecurityPhaseListener functionnality into 
a ViewActionPhaseListener.

But... viewConfigStore can only store Annotations. I need to store 
AnnotatedMethod (have a link back to the Method I'll need to call).

I see 4 possible solutions :

 1 - Duplicate ViewConfigStoreImpl to store AnnotatedMethod elements.
 Ugly, no ?
 2 - Make ViewConfigStore manage all kind of AnnotatedElements with a wrapper 
interface like
interface AnnotatedElement<T> {
Annotation<T> annotation;
Object value;
}
ViewConfigStore :
public interface ViewConfigStore {
public abstract void addAnnotationData(String viewId, AnnotatedElement 
annotation);
public abstract AnnotatedElement<T> T getAnnotationData(String viewId, Class<T> 
type);
public abstract List<AnnotatedElement<T>> getAllAnnotationData(String viewId, 
Class<T> type);
public abstract List<AnnotatedElement> getAllQualifierData(String viewId, 
Class<? extends Annotation> qualifier);
public <T extends Annotation> Map<String, Annotation> 
getAllAnnotationViewMap(Class<T> type);
}
3 - ViewConfigStore could store Annotated elements instead of Annotations
 This would make ViewConfigStore usage a little more complicated though.
4 - Have somes typed Page or View objects.
 This need really more reflection since we need to know what is a View 
(security, view actions, ...).
And it's a big impact on current code.
The ViewConfigStore would be sthing like (really incomplete) :
ViewConfigStore :
public Map<String,ViewInfo> getView(String viewId);
public List<View> getViews();
}
with for instance :
class/interface View {
List<Restriction> getRestrictions();
List<ViewAction> getViewActions(); //or event List<Action> getAction(PhaseId)
}

WDYT ?

P.S. Sorry for the rather long mail........


More details on what I have done for now :

As noted in the ticket, I can now create a viewAction annotation like this one :


@ViewActionBindingType
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
public @interface MyViewAction {
MyAppViewConfig.Pages value();
}

MyAppViewConfig being the sample @ViewConfig annotated class in viewconfig 
sample.

I can then use MyViewAction like this :


@ViewScoped
@Named
public class PageController implements Serializable {
    @MyViewAction(Pages.ITEM)
    public void loadEntry() {
    System.out.println("loadEntry called");
    }
}

For the moment, my code doesn't call this method (I'll just need to copy Seam 
Security code for it ;) ).


I've also created the following annotation that you can use to annotate your 
own viewAction annotation :
 - @Condition(condition=String) -> not really type safe.....
 - @Immediate(immediate=Boolean)
 - @OnPostback(onPostback=boolean)
 - @Phase(value=PhaseIdType)

Also, if you need to customise those behaviour per-usage, you can add 
attributes into your viewAction annotation :
@MyViewAction(Pages.ITEM, immediate=true, condition="#{myBean.eager}")
public void loadEntry()

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Reply via email to