Im' producing SessionScoped bean with them and made successful tests for 
Application scoped as well. They were a solution for me to deal with injection 
point in non dependent scope beans. The other advantage for me is to provide 
one producer bean instead of n (one by services) and avoid third party 
developer who integrate new social service to deal with this plumbing.

regards, 

Antoine

Le 23 déc. 2011 à 10:30, Mark Struberg a écrit :

> I might not have checked the whole stuff behind GenericBean, but they can 
> only produce @Dependent contextual instances, right?
> 
> Thus where is the difference to just create a producer method which examines 
> the InjectionPoint, looks up any annotation and then does the appropriate 
> stuff in there. This must work on any container and is perfectly easy imo. 
> What is the benefit of using GenericBean instead?
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected] 
>> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 9:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Generic Beans Advocacy in Deltaspike
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Dan,
>> 
>> 
>> I also have family of object in Social for each services, that's why I use 
>> them. In the meantime I learn from Jason that they have issues (test won't 
>> pass) on some containers (including JBoss). I'm ready to give some help 
>> maintaining them but won't see me maintain them alone as I took them to help 
>> me in the first place ;-).
>> 
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Antoine SABOT-DURAND
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Blog : http://www.next-presso.fr
>> Twitter ; http://twitter.com/antoine_sd
>> LinkedIn : http://fr.linkedin.com/in/antoinesabotdurand
>> 06 08 55 34 26
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 23 déc. 2011 à 05:54, Dan Allen a écrit :
>> 
>> I'm just speaking off the top of my head here, but I may be able to give you 
>> a lead. I'm pretty sure that the generic beans were originally designed with 
>> the intent of using them in for the Drools module. Granted, that module is 
>> now gone, but I wonder whether the team still intends on using that feature 
>> to register and configure the family of objects needed for Drools to operate.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Dan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 16:00, Antoine Sabot-Durand 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> As I use them in Social, I'm in charge to demonstrate the usefulness of 
>>>> Solder Generic Bean for Delta Spike to keep them. I was wondering if 
>>>> someone else used these in other modules. If you did, could you give me 
>>>> information about the use case that Generic helped to solve ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks a lot,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Antoine SABOT-DURAND
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>> Blog : http://www.next-presso.fr
>>>> Twitter ; http://twitter.com/antoine_sd
>>>> LinkedIn : http://fr.linkedin.com/in/antoinesabotdurand
>>>> 06 08 55 34 26
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> Dan AllenPrincipal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
>>> http://mojavelinux.com/
>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Reply via email to