I agree, it might be helpful to also have a simple code example too. As for the rest of the requirements, they look good to me.

On 12/01/12 15:10, Christian Kaltepoth wrote:
Hi,

with "type safe logging" you are referring to typed loggers like implemented in Solder, right? In this case you could perhaps add a sentence what type safe logging actually is. I don't think that everybody knows that.

Christian


2012/1/12 Ken Finnigan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    As per today's Seam meeting, below is a draft of an email I'll
    send to the DeltaSpike mailing list to re ignite the logging
    discussion, as it is on hold at present.

    Please provide feedback on content and language used, as I want
    this to get the discussion off on the right foot.

    Ken

    =============================
    All,

    As we approach a 0.1 release of DeltaSpike, congratulations to
    everyone on the good work so far, I feel it's a good time to begin
    discussing how we want to handle logging within DeltaSpike.  I
    certainly don't expect this discussion to result in code for 0.1,
    but the earlier we begin this discussion, then it increases the
    likelihood of it being ready for 0.2

    Having been heavily involved in the logging work for Solder, I
    know the pain that can be experienced in not getting it right, and
    also how long it can take to get right.

    I see that there are several goals that we want for logging in
    DeltaSpike:

     1. Make it simple for both extension writers and end users.  If
        it's too difficult to implement, use or even get right, then
        we'll frustrate and alienate developers.
     2. It must perform.  We don't want to introduce large overhead to
        logging.
     3. There should be an option to allow/provide type safe logging.
     4. An end user should be able to have DeltaSpike log against
        whichever logging library they want to utilize in their
        application.  We can certainly support a specific framework as
        a default, but it's important to allow a developer to have the
        same control over how DeltaSpike is logged as their own
        application.

    Thoughts?

    Regards

    Ken Finnigan

    ============================



    _______________________________________________
    seam-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev




--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal




_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Reply via email to