Name improvements for flow directives
-------------------------------------
Key: SEAMCATCH-22
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMCATCH-22
Project: Seam Catch
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Core API
Affects Versions: Alpha2
Reporter: Dan Allen
Assignee: Jason Porter
PROCEED -> MARK_HANDLED
The directive PROCEED is too vague, and doesn't address the fact that the
exception is being marked as handled. Better is to name the directive
MARK_HANDLED. This is similar to JTA's setRollbackOnly(). It doesn't perform
the action until the frame is complete, but it does mark the eventual action.
PROCEED_TO_CAUSE -> DROP_CAUSE
The directive PROCEED_TO_CAUSE is problematic on two accounts. First, it has
the same problem as PROCEED in that it's too vague. Second, we aren't moving to
the cause, we are moving from the cause to the wrapper. So what we are really
doing is dropping the cause, hence DROP_CAUSE. Also, this should not mark the
exception as handled.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
seam-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-issues
