[ 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMSERVLET-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12595784#comment-12595784
 ] 

Nicklas Karlsson commented on SEAMSERVLET-35:
---------------------------------------------

Could the issues be the "lazy" in 
org.jboss.weld.context.beanstore.http.LazySessionBeanStore.getSession(LazySessionBeanStore.java:68
 ?

> Calling session-scoped components from session initialized observer goes into 
> infinite loop
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SEAMSERVLET-35
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMSERVLET-35
>             Project: Seam Servlet
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Event Bridge
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0.CR3
>            Reporter: Nicklas Karlsson
>
> Given a session scoped component
> @SessionScoped
> public class Pinger implements Serializable
> {
>       public void ping()
>       {
>       };
> }
> and a session initialized observer calling it
> public class Observer
> {
>       @Inject
>       Pinger pinger;
>       public void newSession(@Observes @Initialized HttpSession s)
>       {
>               pinger.ping();
>       }
> }
> We go off into an infinite loop. Since Pinger doesn't exist, it is created 
> and placed in the session scoped beanstore, which creates a session and fires 
> off the observer. I'm not sure why the session isn't considered created at 
> this point. This is bordering on feature since I think the result would be 
> the same if servlet listeners would be used. Perhaps this could be worked 
> around int the event bridge somehow so that the firing would be prevented if 
> we're already handling the session created event...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
seam-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-issues

Reply via email to