[ 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMCRON-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12619999#comment-12619999
 ] 

Martin Kouba commented on SEAMCRON-28:
--------------------------------------

I think it would be better to allow module user to utilize full configuration 
abilities of underlying implementation (quartz, queuj, ...). Exposing common 
settings will result in reducing those possibilities. Nevertheless either of 
these is much better than hard-coded configuration :-).

> Make settings like ThreadPool configurable
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SEAMCRON-28
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMCRON-28
>             Project: Seam Cron
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Alpha1
>            Reporter: Peter Royle
>            Assignee: Peter Royle
>              Labels: configuration, per, provider
>             Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha2
>
>
> The main dilemar here is whether or not we should expose common settings in 
> the API so that users need only learn one syntax, or should the provider 
> provide the config options so only those options supported by the provider 
> are accessible when using that provider? Not all options will be supported by 
> all providers and vice versa.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
_______________________________________________
seam-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-issues

Reply via email to