On 12/07/2012 12:18 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote: > rpcraig wrote: >> On 12/07/2012 12:12 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote: >>> Is there currently guidance on creating types in the device-specific >>> policy? I can see arguments either way, just want to be consistent >>> with what you guys are doing. >> >> >> Ideally they would indicate something about what kind of device they are >> logically (i.e. convey some meaning to a policy writer). > > Sorry, that isn't what I meant. Is there guidance on whether we should > be creating types in policy in BOARD_SEPOLICY_DIRS or should type > creation be kept in external/sepolicy?
It can be a tough call. It matters how truly device specific your label is, or you think it is. Given that I'm also seeing similar behavior, maybe we can reach some consensus on a label for us both and place it in external/sepolicy (as long as we believe our gpus are behaving the same way). -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the seandroid-list mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with the words "unsubscribe seandroid-list" without quotes as the message.
