On Apr 28, 2015 5:49 AM, "Stephen Smalley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 04/27/2015 07:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Jumping in off of this old thread: > > http://marc.info/?l=seandroid-list&m=140560177420732&w=2 > > > > Their seems to be 3 approaches that centered around resolving sysfs entry > > labeling that I have found, they are: > > 1. Fixup ueventd to add "online" event support for sysfs_fixup_perms() > > calls and update the uevent config file > > > > 2. Add a restorecon_recursive in the init.rc for the offending path > > > > 3. Correct sysfs so new nodes coming in inherent parent labels. > > > > Whats the status on 3, was that ever taken up? > > Not AFAIK. On #1, I don't believe we get "online" events for these > files in ueventd; the ueventd code already includes support for "online" > events and calls sysfs_fixup_perms() in
Well support was there for create. So if you have an entry in uevent config file then it should call fixup. that case. #2 is the current > approach taken in a number of init.<board>.rc files, although I'm not > sure it has been done for them all. > > > _______________________________________________ > Seandroid-list mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. > To get help, send an email containing "help" to [email protected].
_______________________________________________ Seandroid-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. To get help, send an email containing "help" to [email protected].
