Hi Stephen,

it is a field issue and we see only on 1 set. it is seen on android N set.
it is strange that it is seen on only 1 set. can it be hardware issue? DDR
issue since we see ebitmap is giving different data?.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Stephen Smalley <s...@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:

> On 04/11/2018 06:12 AM, kiran mardi wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I see in one of my device getting the selinux policy loading error
> during init first stage.
> > however the logs give every boot different error w.r.t selinux policy
> loading.
> >
> > 1st bootup of set:
> >
> > [    7.933699] init: SELinux:  Could not load policy:  Out of memory
> > [    7.938900] init: failed to load policy: Out of memory
> > [    7.943884] init: Security failure; rebooting into recovery mode...
> >
> >
> > 2nd bootup[to recovery]:
> >
> > [ 7.028166] SELinux: ebitmap start bit (*400*) is not a multiple of the
> map unit size (64)
> > [    7.035557] init: SELinux:  Could not load policy:  Invalid argument
> > [    7.041652] init: failed to load policy: Invalid argument
> > [    7.047031] init: Security failure; rebooting into recovery mode...
> >
> >
> > 3rd bootup[to recovery]:
> >
> > [ 7.622606] SELinux: ebitmap: map size *1048640 *does not match my size
> 64 (high bit was 0)
> >  [    7.630081] init: SELinux:  Could not load policy:  Invalid argument
> >  [    7.636214] init: failed to load policy: Invalid argument
> > [    7.641447] init: Security failure; rebooting into recovery mode...
> >
> >
> > is it problem with my kernel allocating memory for selinux sys/fs?
> > can i suspect RAM not working properly?
>
> Sounds like the policy is corrupted.  Can you confirm that the policy file
> itself is valid, e.g. on the build host, run seinfo on the policy file?
>
> Does your kernel match your policy?  There was an incompatible change in
> policy format between Android 6 Marshmallow and Android 7 Nougat; Google
> provided a backward compatibility patch in their common kernels so that
> Android 7 kernels could still load older policies.
>
>


-- 
regards,
kiran mardi

Reply via email to