Re: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot

2016-03-10 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Correct Diego

And that's a desired effect so that a node gets a lot of bandwidth to complete 
its join. You better complete a few at a time then have hundreds half way 
through and none fully done.

We may actually reject a join if the queue is too long, exhausting=sleep well 
and come back in 10

Take care,

Pascal

Le 11 mars 2016 ? 00:25, Prof. Diego Dujovne 
mailto:diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl>> a ?crit :

Pascal,
  I was thinking of a worst-case condition: all neighbours are
willing to join. A limited pool would satisfy only a part of them, thus
putting the rest of the nodes in a join queue. Am I correct?
Regards,

  Diego


2016-03-04 7:55 GMT-03:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) 
mailto:pthub...@cisco.com>>:
Hello Diego:

One suggestion would be that when a node attempts to join, the parent 
immediately grants a set of cells for the join process from a limited pool (to 
avoid DDOS). These cells are to be released at the end of the join and are 
there to boost the bandwidth for that critical phase.

Cheers,

Pascal

From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch-boun...@ietf.org>] 
On Behalf Of Prof. Diego Dujovne
Sent: jeudi 3 mars 2016 17:12
To: 6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot

Dear all,
Although it was discussed, there is no specification
on the 6top behaviour at boot. The discussion point here is if the
6top messages shall be transmitted on minimal cells until
the slotframe 1 (SFR1) has been populated enough to support
the transactions.
  - The use of minimal is optional. In case minimal is used,
the decision on when to switch is out of scope?
  - In case minimal is not used, shall we specify another
mechanism to enable 6top to transmit messages?
Thanks!
Regards,
 Diego Dujovne

--
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Acad?mico Escuela de Ingenier?a en Inform?tica y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingenier?a UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl<http://www.ingenieria.udp.cl>
(56 2) 676 8125



--
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Acad?mico Escuela de Ingenier?a en Inform?tica y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingenier?a UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl<http://www.ingenieria.udp.cl>
(56 2) 676 8125
___
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch


Re: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot

2016-03-10 Thread Prof. Diego Dujovne
Pascal,
  I was thinking of a worst-case condition: all neighbours are
willing to join. A limited pool would satisfy only a part of them, thus
putting the rest of the nodes in a join queue. Am I correct?
Regards,

  Diego


2016-03-04 7:55 GMT-03:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) :

> Hello Diego:
>
>
>
> One suggestion would be that when a node attempts to join, the parent
> immediately grants a set of cells for the join process from a limited pool
> (to avoid DDOS). These cells are to be released at the end of the join and
> are there to boost the bandwidth for that critical phase.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Prof.
> Diego Dujovne
> *Sent:* jeudi 3 mars 2016 17:12
> *To:* 6tisch@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Although it was discussed, there is no specification
>
> on the 6top behaviour at boot. The discussion point here is if the
>
> 6top messages shall be transmitted on minimal cells until
>
> the slotframe 1 (SFR1) has been populated enough to support
>
> the transactions.
>
>   - The use of minimal is optional. In case minimal is used,
>
> the decision on when to switch is out of scope?
>
>   - In case minimal is not used, shall we specify another
>
> mechanism to enable 6top to transmit messages?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
>  Diego Dujovne
>
>
> --
>
> DIEGO DUJOVNE
> Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
> Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
> www.ingenieria.udp.cl
> (56 2) 676 8125
>



-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125
___
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch


Re: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot

2016-03-04 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Hello Diego:

One suggestion would be that when a node attempts to join, the parent 
immediately grants a set of cells for the join process from a limited pool (to 
avoid DDOS). These cells are to be released at the end of the join and are 
there to boost the bandwidth for that critical phase.

Cheers,

Pascal

From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Prof. Diego Dujovne
Sent: jeudi 3 mars 2016 17:12
To: 6tisch@ietf.org
Subject: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot

Dear all,
Although it was discussed, there is no specification
on the 6top behaviour at boot. The discussion point here is if the
6top messages shall be transmitted on minimal cells until
the slotframe 1 (SFR1) has been populated enough to support
the transactions.
  - The use of minimal is optional. In case minimal is used,
the decision on when to switch is out of scope?
  - In case minimal is not used, shall we specify another
mechanism to enable 6top to transmit messages?
Thanks!
Regards,
 Diego Dujovne

--
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl<http://www.ingenieria.udp.cl>
(56 2) 676 8125
___
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch


[6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: 6top protocol behaviour at boot

2016-03-03 Thread Prof. Diego Dujovne
Dear all,
Although it was discussed, there is no specification
on the 6top behaviour at boot. The discussion point here is if the
6top messages shall be transmitted on minimal cells until
the slotframe 1 (SFR1) has been populated enough to support
the transactions.
  - The use of minimal is optional. In case minimal is used,
the decision on when to switch is out of scope?
  - In case minimal is not used, shall we specify another
mechanism to enable 6top to transmit messages?
Thanks!
Regards,

 Diego Dujovne

-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125
___
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch