Re: [9fans] i.e. (was go toolchain)
If you have problems we can try to help you off list. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:30 PM, David Leimbach wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros > wrote: >> >> Now that I remember, we recently added some demos for >> o/live & octopus to the http://lsub.org/ls/demos.html >> page and we didn't post here to let 9fans know. > > Thanks, this is very cool. I'm considering setting up a PC at my office, and > a PC at home, and then terminals on each to the other, but I'm not sure if > that's necessary or if the two PCs would suffice. > Also should this be working on Snow Leopard? I'm having some difficulty but > not sure where I'm making mistakes. > Dave > >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros >> wrote: >> > no yet. >> > I'll post here when there's something to see. >> > >> > Sorry to polute the go thread with this, hence the new subject. >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jack Johnson >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros >> >> wrote: >> >>> FTS, I'm interesting in getting Go here because I'm going to write >> >>> the i.e. window system (successor of o/live, o/mero, ...) also in go, >> >>> to run >> >>> at least the viewer native on unix systems. The C version is still >> >>> cooking. >> >> >> >> Is there an overview/paper/etc. for i.e? >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >
Re: [9fans] i.e. (was go toolchain)
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > Now that I remember, we recently added some demos for > o/live & octopus to the http://lsub.org/ls/demos.html > page and we didn't post here to let 9fans know. > Thanks, this is very cool. I'm considering setting up a PC at my office, and a PC at home, and then terminals on each to the other, but I'm not sure if that's necessary or if the two PCs would suffice. Also should this be working on Snow Leopard? I'm having some difficulty but not sure where I'm making mistakes. Dave > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros > wrote: > > no yet. > > I'll post here when there's something to see. > > > > Sorry to polute the go thread with this, hence the new subject. > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jack Johnson > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros > wrote: > >>> FTS, I'm interesting in getting Go here because I'm going to write > >>> the i.e. window system (successor of o/live, o/mero, ...) also in go, > to run > >>> at least the viewer native on unix systems. The C version is still > cooking. > >> > >> Is there an overview/paper/etc. for i.e? > >> > >> > > > >
Re: [9fans] i.e. (was go toolchain)
Now that I remember, we recently added some demos for o/live & octopus to the http://lsub.org/ls/demos.html page and we didn't post here to let 9fans know. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > no yet. > I'll post here when there's something to see. > > Sorry to polute the go thread with this, hence the new subject. > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jack Johnson wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros >> wrote: >>> FTS, I'm interesting in getting Go here because I'm going to write >>> the i.e. window system (successor of o/live, o/mero, ...) also in go, to run >>> at least the viewer native on unix systems. The C version is still cooking. >> >> Is there an overview/paper/etc. for i.e? >> >> >
[9fans] i.e. (was go toolchain)
no yet. I'll post here when there's something to see. Sorry to polute the go thread with this, hence the new subject. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jack Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros > wrote: >> FTS, I'm interesting in getting Go here because I'm going to write >> the i.e. window system (successor of o/live, o/mero, ...) also in go, to run >> at least the viewer native on unix systems. The C version is still cooking. > > Is there an overview/paper/etc. for i.e? > >
