[Bug 9684] New: ACPI: fix acpi fan state set error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9684 Summary: ACPI: fix acpi fan state set error Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2,6.24-rc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Other AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur: None Distribution: FC8 Hardware Environment: All Software Environment: All Problem Description:Under /proc/acpi, there is a fan control interface, a user can set 0 or 3 to /proc/acpi/fan/*/state, 0 denotes D0 state, 3 denotes D3 state, but in current implementation, a user can set a fan to D1 state by any char excluding '1', '2' and '3'. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo 3 /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo x /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on Obviously, such inputs as and x are invalid for fan state. Steps to reproduce: [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo 3 /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo x /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo 3 /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo 3x /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: off [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# echo -1x /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/fan/C31B/state status: on [EMAIL PROTECTED] acpi]# -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9684] ACPI: fix acpi fan state set error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9684 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:12 --- Created an attachment (id=14274) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14274action=view) Fix acpi fan state set error This patch fixed this bug, please consider to apply, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:22 --- Created an attachment (id=14275) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14275action=view) Try the customed DSDT Hi, Giovanni Will you please try the customed DSDT on the broken bios? How to use customed DSDT can be found on the following website: http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/faq.php Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:31 --- Created an attachment (id=14276) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14276action=view) Try the customed DSDT Hi, Fabien Will you please try the customed DSDT on the broken bios? How to use customed DSDT can be found on the following website: http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/faq.php Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:56 --- Hi, Givoanni Fabien Will you please try the customed DSDT for your notebooks? Please enable the acpi debug and add the boot option of acpi.debug_level=0x0f. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9277] ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it via _BCM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9277 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 03:06 --- I can confirm that this patch fixes the flicker problem with gnome-power-manager. Remaining issues are most likely caused by duplicate video device issue, described in bug #9614. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9614] Duplicate video device for Toshiba Satellite A100-847
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 02:39 --- sorry, I was wrong before. It doesn't work with RFKILL disabled. I didn't test it in the range of my AP, that's why it worked I guess (btw, the range of rt2500pci is poor, sth like 2-3m :( ) With your patch, it doesn't crash on resume. Instead the display stays black and no keypresses are recognized. In fact, it's the same execpt those LEDs aren't blinking. I have to hard-poweroff the laptop. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 04:20 --- I am lost about using a custom DSDT. I am on Debian testing with vanilla 2.6.23.12. My steps: - Compiled DSDT with iasl -tc - Patched vanilla with http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.8.4-2.6.21.patch - Enabled new function on config (CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD=y) and maked new deb - Placed dsdt.aml in /etc/initramfs-tools/DSDT.aml, which is automagically includend in initramfs by mkinitramfs (i checked it with verbose option for update-initramfs). After these steps, my dmesg don't show any Looking for DSDT in initrd, so i think the patch don't worked well or isn't enabled correctly. I should pass some special parameter to grub command-line? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9614] Duplicate video device for Toshiba Satellite A100-847
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614 --- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 06:10 --- The patch from comment #13 fixes the issue for me. Without haldaemon and g-p-m running, I can switch through 8 values of brightness, as under windows. There is only one device visible as well. If haldaemon and g-p-m are running, one issue remains. There are nine steps down (the last one does not really do anything) and eight steps up. I suspect that's because the percentage values do not overlap with eight available levels very well. I'll try laptop_panel.brightness_in_hardware quirk and report back. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9614] Duplicate video device for Toshiba Satellite A100-847
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614 --- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 06:21 --- The quirk does not change anything here. Looks like a bug in gnome-power-manager then - the two lowest values are reported by /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness as 10. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9625] brightness control on thinkpad t61p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9625 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 07:11 --- ThinkPad ACPI backlight mode means the firmware doesn't poke the hardware at all when the user presses brightness up/down hot keys. Instead, it just sends the 0x86 and 0x87 notifications to the relevant ACPI display device. You enable it in a thinkpad when you *execute* any _BCL method it provides. ACPI video.c should work fine in a thinkpad... *if* it is working at all, and as long as: 1. video.c is fixed to do rounding to the nearest _BCL-provided level instead of setting whatever the user echoed to sysfs (some ThinkPads deal well with it, others apparently don't). 2. We add the capability to tell video.c to NOT export a backlight interface, since it does more (such as video output selection), and *userspace* can be very stupid and do extremely braindamaged things that are not easy at all to debug for, but become apparent if you take away the backlight interfaces it is using to break brightness control :-) 3. We fix the issue video.c has with inactive ACPI nodes that it is exporting interfaces for. As for Xorg and xbacklight, it is sort of a bit of a mess. The very newest versions, I am told, can be configured to: 1. talk to the kernel backlight interface (which one(s) is not properly configurable yet). 2. talk directly to the hardware 3. talk to ACPI(?) or maybe to both. I am not clear on what the third option is. For Lenovo thinkpads, either (1) or (2) is fine if ACPI video is working. Doing both breaks things badly quite fast. Which is why I don't enable thinkpad-acpi's backlight interface on Lenovo thinkpads by default anymore... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 165150] Fedora ACPI meta-bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora ACPI meta-bug. Alias: FCMETA_ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165150 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||427518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 427518] ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it via _BCM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it via _BCM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427518 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED], acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et OtherBugsDependingO||165150 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 10:55 EST --- Adding ACPI metadata. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 09:13 --- Another thing that might be interesting: the following debug messages are printed when loading the acpi_cpufreq module the second time (i.e. when it works). Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x14] XPSS value :0003 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local0 index : Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local3 index :0007 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index : Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0001 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0002 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0003 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0004 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0005 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local0 index :0001 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local3 index :0008 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index : Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0001 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0002 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0003 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0004 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0005 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local0 index :0002 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local3 index :0009 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index : Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0001 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0002 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0003 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0004 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local1 index :0005 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x1E] Result: Local0 index :0003 Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x1E] Result: Local3 index :000A Jan 4 18:09:07 FABP kernel: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Result: XPSS :0003 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 08:55 --- Created an attachment (id=14281) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14281action=view) dmesg with custom DSDT for debugging Ok it took me some time but here is the result and the steps I used. First, the DSDT you attached for me didn't compile with iasl DSDT.dsl: DSDT-debug.dsl 793: Load (buf0, HNDL) Error4044 - Invalid type ^ ([Integer|String|Buffer|Reference] found, Load operator requires [FieldUnit|Region]) I tried to understand why, and it turned out it wasn't important at all, so I eventually compiled with iasl -f DSDT.dsl But as I'm curious, I extracted the SSDT you were storing in the buf0 buffer to an AML file, then disassembled it. Then I realized I had attached the SSDT for CPU2, and you were using it when loading the CPU1 SSDT in the DSDT... I don't know if it's important or not, but I think it would have caused the SSDT for CPU1 not to be loaded at all. Bah, I didn't want to take any risk, so I basically did everything again like you had done (including the debug messages), but with the SSDT of CPU1. If you need it for other tests, please tell me and I'll attach it. Also please note that I'm using openSUSE 10.3, and they include a more advanced patch to load the custom DSDT (it supports SSDT too, I tried it but it didn't work as there were no ACPI Debug messages in dmesg). So instead of the Looking for DSDT in initrd message, it's ACPI: successfully read 36644 bytes from file /DSDT.aml and ACPI: Override [DSDT-F3J1] from initramfs - tainting kernel (lines 104/105) The interesting stuff starts at line 515 I think: [ACPI Debug] String: [0x14] XPSS value :0003 [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local0 index : [ACPI Debug] String: [0x16] Local3 index :FFFD -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9673] IDE/ACPI related hibernation regression: Second attempt fails
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 11:57 --- Created an attachment (id=14284) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14284action=view) dmidecode output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 151396] Megaraid driver resets indefinitly unless acpi=off
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Megaraid driver resets indefinitly unless acpi=off https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151396 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Red Hat Enterprise Linux|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Version|4 |4.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 14:38 EST --- Closing issue. I cannot observe this problem anymore with recent RHEL 4.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 --- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 11:35 --- Is there anything in the logs about the resume? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 --- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 11:47 --- yes, now that you say it: Jan 4 11:17:10 jan Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -191677227 ns) Jan 4 11:17:14 jan WARNING: at net/mac80211/rx.c:1486 __ieee80211_rx() Jan 4 11:17:14 jan Pid: 4388, comm: dbus-daemon Not tainted 2.6.24-rc6-gb8c9a187-dirty #2 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [f8e89f59] __ieee80211_rx+0xbf9/0xd10 [mac80211] Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c01475b0] file_read_actor+0x0/0x130 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [f8e662d6] rt2x00pci_rxdone+0x96/0x1c0 [rt2x00pci] Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [f8e7c0bd] ieee80211_tasklet_handler+0xdd/0xf0 [mac80211] Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [f8e66348] rt2x00pci_rxdone+0x108/0x1c0 [rt2x00pci] Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c0121a63] tasklet_action+0x33/0x70 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c01219b2] __do_softirq+0x42/0x90 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c0121a27] do_softirq+0x27/0x30 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c0121c95] irq_exit+0x65/0x70 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c0106733] do_IRQ+0x43/0x80 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c016a451] sys_read+0x41/0x70 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan [c0104b8f] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28 Jan 4 11:17:14 jan === -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 312981] kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 do not wake up after suspend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 do not wake up after suspend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |l.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:20 EST --- hi Jon, here the smolt link: http://www.smolts.org/show?UUID=cd3b2bd4-b912-4f4b-9805-c3de96497f88 unfortunally it doen't works for me, if you need i can attache a smoltSendProfile output. I discovered that pm-suspend works if i manually unload the b44 module. I can suspend and resume the system if i do not have this module in memory. It works from tty1 and from Xorg. It works even if i create a file /etc/pm/config.d/unload_modules containing: SUSPEND_MODULES=b44 now: should i close this bug? many thanks for the suggestions. Luigi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9673] IDE/ACPI related hibernation regression: Second attempt fails
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14284|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 --- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 14:01 --- Created an attachment (id=14285) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14285action=view) Move data into 4-byte aligned memory addresss Hmm that means RX has properly kicked in again after resume. The warning is fixable with attached patch, _but_ that shouldn't be the cause of the blank screen. Is there anything else in the log? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9485] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device 'on'
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9485 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 14:40 --- Created an attachment (id=14286) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14286action=view) acpidump (kernel 2.6.24-rc6; Abit IC7-G) ~ # cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/*/* 0 - Active; 1 - Passive polling disabled state: ok temperature: 41 C critical (S5): 70 C active[0]: 60 C: devices= FAN ~ # cat /proc/acpi/fan/*/* status: off The fan is always on. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 --- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:01 --- nope, nothing. with your latest move-data-into-4-byte..patch even the above warning and oops disappeared. it's not only that my display is black, keyboard isn't working either. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9485] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device 'on'
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9485 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:03 --- active[0] is the temperature where the fan starts spinning at full speed once exceeded; at the moment the fan is set to 60% speed (FanEQ). No dmesg spam so far. Now I am compiling something, the CPU temp is 60C°+, the fan starts spinning at full speed and the dmesg spam starts: ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D0 ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D0 ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [f7c165a0] 'on' ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D0 ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D0 ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [f7c165a0] 'on /proc/acpi/fan/FAN/state still says: status: off The compile process is done now, the CPU is getting more cooler, under the active[0] limit (~43°C) and the fan DOES NOT throttle down to 60%. It's still running at fullspeed (I think this is wrong.) But there is no more dmesg spam. This is really strange for me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 6654] USB 2.0 high speed mode (ehci_hcd module) won't work without acpi=noirq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654 --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:59 --- OK, if somebody volunteers to test them, I'll write some test patches. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 312981] kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 21:12 EST --- I'll also reassign to network maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 312981] kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|kernel 2.6.23- |kernel 2.6.23- |0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 do not |0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 |wake up after suspend |module suspend issues --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 21:10 EST --- I don't think that closing it is appropriate, but changing the subject sure is. I'll do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 165150] Fedora ACPI meta-bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora ACPI meta-bug. Alias: FCMETA_ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165150 Bug 165150 depends on bug 312981, which changed state. Bug 312981 Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 312981] kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 21:29 EST --- I'm thinking that this is actually a duplicate of bug 240964. I will close this one dup to that, and if we find later that it's different this bug can be re-opened. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 240964 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8853] irq NN: nobody cared on ThinkPad X61T,T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #125 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 19:18 --- Just bumping to confirm this issue is very much present on my X61. Benjamin: any status update from your contact at lenovo? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8853] irq NN: nobody cared on ThinkPad X61T,T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853 --- Comment #126 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 19:30 --- Nope, not yet, but monitor the BIOS update site as they may not tell me right away if/when they post a fixed version -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8853] irq NN: nobody cared on ThinkPad X61T,T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853 --- Comment #127 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 20:37 --- I just noticed that the 1.11 version of the BIOS is available. On the Lenovo web site, the Driver Matrix page for the X61/X61s claims the latest BIOS version is 1.10, but if you actually click on the link (http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-67982) it takes you to a page for the 1.11 version of the BIOS. Having tried it, I can also confirm that it doesn't fix the problem (not that surprising, the change log doesn't mention fixing the spurious BIOS problem, and that was mentioned in the T61 firmware update). It looks like the same Bios is used for the Thinkpad Reserve edition, which is priced at roughly twice the normal X61s, but supposed has better service. Maybe if we can find someone who purchased it who can complain to Lenovo? :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] rt2x00: no wakeup from S3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|s2ram regression|rt2x00: no wakeup from S3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 5809] Status/state for LID is _close_ while the lid is open - Samsung X20 1730
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5809 --- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 22:12 --- can you add some timing detail to that? ie. does the button/lid even happen immediately upon hitting the lid switch? (i expect yes). And it looks like the state file catches up with reality -- how long does it take to switch between incorrect to correct? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9341] /proc/acpi/battery displays Incorrect voltages - Gateway 450ROG, MSI GX700
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|/proc/acpi/battery displays |/proc/acpi/battery displays |Incorrect voltages |Incorrect voltages - Gateway ||450ROG, MSI GX700 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
