resource utilization question
Given that resource utilization is set to 10 and $OBJ1 and $OBJ2 are variables containing multiple filesystem names... and the following command is issued: $TSMDIR/dsmc archive -server=tsmpc1 -subdir=yes -archmc=keep_07_years $OBJ1 $OBJ2 1 $TSMDIR/dsmsched.log Will $OBJ1 and $OBJ2 execute sequentially or in parallel? Will the filesystems stored within $OBJ1 and $OBJ2 execute sequentially or in parallel? If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Storage Pool Locking
Does anyone know of a quick way of determining who is locking space in the storage pool? If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
TDP/ORACLE Backup
When running a TDP for Oracle backup, does TDP lock the estimated amount of the storage pool which it thinks it needs to complete the backup? If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Re: TDP/ORACLE Backup
Is it possible to change the estimated size? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Rasmussen Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP/ORACLE Backup Keep in mind that TDP Oracle just passes on what Oracle/Rman asks it to. So for DB estimation, TDP Oracle uses the value that Oracle passes to it (which probably is overestimated). If compression is turned on then this value is grossly overestimated. Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development Data Protection for Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/06/2004 08:08 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject TDP/ORACLE Backup When running a TDP for Oracle backup, does TDP lock the estimated amount of the storage pool which it thinks it needs to complete the backup? If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
backup complete, server still has session in run state
... anyone seen this? I have a client that completes it's backup successfully, but the server still has the session in run state many hours later. TSM Server Environment Platform Z/os TSM Server 5.2.2.4 TSM Client Platform SunOS 5.8 B/A client 5.2 If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
SQL select management classes + node name
Does anyone have a quick select statement that will give me all of the management clases that a particular node uses? thx. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Re: TDP Oracle Question
Bruce, You should make sure that the percentage utilized in your storage pool is 0% prior to running your backup. Also, are any other backups running. Keep in mind that once TSM sees that it's going to need 133Gig of disk to backup the Oracle db, it will attempt to lock that amount of the stg pool. If the full amount is not available, it will go to the next stg pool. Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kamp, Bruce Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question That is set to 200G. - Bruce Kamp Senior Midrange Systems Analyst Memorial Healthcare System E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Pager: (954) 286-9441 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (954) 985-1404 - -Original Message- From: Hooft, Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question Maybe setting on disk storagepool: Maximum Size Threshold? Jeroen -Original Message- From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 24 mei 2004 14:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDP Oracle Question I'm trying to give enough disk to my Oracle backups but have not been successful. My management classes point to disk. How do I find out how much disk TSM is looking for to backup straight to disk? I looked on the system saw that the dbf files added up to about 133G I have given it 200G. Or is there something else that could be pointing to tape instead of disk? I'm running TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1. The client is running TSM 5.1.5.11 TDP Oracle ver 2.2.0.1 with Oracle 8.1.7.4. Thanks, - Bruce Kamp Senior Midrange Systems Analyst Memorial Healthcare System E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Pager: (954) 286-9441 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (954) 985-1404 - If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Re: TDPO for Oracle
You may want to break the link to prevent TDP from using the INCLEXCL file that's normally in a dsm.sys file. If you don't, you'll generate errors. If linked, and commented out, your normal backups won't have an INCLEXCL file, hence, you'll backup everything on your client server during your regular client backup. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davidson, Becky Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDPO for Oracle We had an issue with this and discovered that it was looking in the api directory for the dsm.sys and not the ba/bin directory so we just put a link in api to bin and it worked. -Original Message- From: Josh-Daniel Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDPO for Oracle Dale, Did you check the basics of, as oracle, or your tdpo user: # env | grep DSM Make sure the DSMI variables point to the right locations, then verify those files are readable by your user. If after verifying this, you might want to let us know what version of oracle, tdpo and tsmc you have on this node. --- Josh Davis On 04.03.22 at 13:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:17:14 -0600 From: Jolliff, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDPO for Oracle I see this question has been asked several times in the list, but I fail to see any answers on ADSM.ORG. I'm getting the ANS0263E Either the dsm.sys file was not found, or the Inclexcl file specified in the dsm.sys was not found error when trying to set the password after installing the 64 bit TDPO on Solaris 8. (The 32 bit version installs fine) Anyone have the fix for this handy? Dale Jolliff Data Administration Team Backup and Recovery == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ ==
GIGE connectivity via TSM
This should be an easy one for most... I have a Solaris client running TSM v5.2. It will be getting a GIGE card. What is the best/recommended way to ensure data is traversing the GIGE card (in both directions... outbound/inbound) if it is not set up as the default NIC on the client. thx. == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ ==
Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM
Michael, Yes my client and server are on different networks, as will be the GIGE card relative to other NICs on the client. I didn't want to get into maintaining a routing table, but if that's the only way to ensure communication over the GIGE in both directions, I guess that'll have to do. My next question, is that the only way to ensure bi-directional communication over the GIGE? thx. -joe- -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of French, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM Is your TSM server on a different network from the client? Is the GigE card on a different network then the other interface on the machine? I would assume so, if that is the case, just set a permenant route that points to the TSM server's network and tell it to go out the GigE interface to get there. Man route to see the exact syntax. Once the client connects over that interface, the TSM server should use that IP to call the box (if that's how you have scheduling setup). Michael French -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) Sent: Tue 3/23/2004 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:GIGE connectivity via TSM This should be an easy one for most... I have a Solaris client running TSM v5.2. It will be getting a GIGE card. What is the best/recommended way to ensure data is traversing the GIGE card (in both directions... outbound/inbound) if it is not set up as the default NIC on the client. thx. == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ == == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ ==
Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM
I don't disagree, but does this gaurantee that the data coming from the server will traverse the GIGE NIC as well? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM My understanding of TCPCLIENTADDRESS is different. We use it for multi-homed boxes that have a separate NIC that connects to a private, internal, GIGE subnet so that the backups are pushed across it versus the public subnet. To verify this, when I check the details for a TSM node (on the TSM server), the IP address it shows changes to the private subnet, not the public one that was previously being used. Andrew Raibeck..care to confirm this ? Dwight Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/23/2004 10:49 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM tcpclientaddress only sets the initial address for the server to come in on (last I remember) beyond that, standard system/network routing takes over. I'm still at 4.2 5.1 (moving to 5.2 in the next couple of months) but we currently put route statements on the client nodes to ensure they exit out their proper interfaces to access the tsm server(s). Dwight E. Cook Systems Management Integration Professional, Advanced Integrated Storage Management TSM Administration (918) 925-8045 Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: .COMSubject: GIGE connectivity via TSM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 03/23/2004 09:28 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager This should be an easy one for most... I have a Solaris client running TSM v5.2. It will be getting a GIGE card. What is the best/recommended way to ensure data is traversing the GIGE card (in both directions... outbound/inbound) if it is not set up as the default NIC on the client. thx. == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ == == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ == attachment: ATT58796.gifattachment: ATT58797.gifattachment: ATT58798.gif
Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM
OK... now things are getting fuzzy. This was my initial concern. Can anyone confirm exactly what one needs to do to ensure one traverses the GIGE NIC for both inbound and outbound traffic? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dwight Cook Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM tcpclientaddress only sets the initial address for the server to come in on (last I remember) beyond that, standard system/network routing takes over. I'm still at 4.2 5.1 (moving to 5.2 in the next couple of months) but we currently put route statements on the client nodes to ensure they exit out their proper interfaces to access the tsm server(s). Dwight E. Cook Systems Management Integration Professional, Advanced Integrated Storage Management TSM Administration (918) 925-8045 Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: .COMSubject: GIGE connectivity via TSM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 03/23/2004 09:28 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager This should be an easy one for most... I have a Solaris client running TSM v5.2. It will be getting a GIGE card. What is the best/recommended way to ensure data is traversing the GIGE card (in both directions... outbound/inbound) if it is not set up as the default NIC on the client. thx. == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ == == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ ==
Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM
Bill, I hate to beat this... but my situationa is as follows: I have a TSM server residing on Z/OS with an FQDN and one IP address (as far as I know). My client has multiple NICs. We want to use a particular GIGE card exclusively for backup/restore and the others for applications, so we can't disable the others. My server's IP is not on the same subnet as my client's GIGE card, so the default route would not be over the GIGE. QUESTIONS: 1. Do I need to statically route the client GIGE ip address to the Server Ip address in the client's routing table? 2. Does this ensure that data coming from the server to the client will come down that path as well. (I don't want to fall into your I had a client... scenario. thx. joe -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Boyer Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM If you use the GIGE address of the TSM server in your DSM.OPT file on the client, then the BACKUP data will go over the GIGE card. Any data FROM the TSM server TO the client will go out the network adapter on the TSM server however TCPIP routing takes it. If you have multiple adapters in the TSM server, the outbound traffic will first go the adapter that is on the same subnet as the client. If the GIGE and client are not on the same subnet, then the traffic will go out the default route unless you have a specific ROUTE in effect. If you want ALL data to go in and out the GIGE card, either disable the other adapters, or change the default route to be the GIGE adapter. I had a client that had in their AIX TSM server 1 10/100 card and 2 GIGE cards ALL set to the same subnet. Backup inbound data to the TSM server came in over the GIGE adapter, but since the 10/100 card was the default route, all outbound traffic, and that included RESTOREs went out the 10/100. They couldn't figure out why restores too so long. Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dwight Cook Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM Use a traceroute command from your client box to the specific ip address you want to go into on your tsm server. Your backups will take the same path. That simple... Dwight E. Cook Systems Management Integration Professional, Advanced Integrated Storage Management TSM Administration (918) 925-8045 Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: .COMSubject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 03/23/2004 10:28 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager OK... now things are getting fuzzy. This was my initial concern. Can anyone confirm exactly what one needs to do to ensure one traverses the GIGE NIC for both inbound and outbound traffic? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dwight Cook Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE connectivity via TSM tcpclientaddress only sets the initial address for the server to come in on (last I remember) beyond that, standard system/network routing takes over. I'm still at 4.2 5.1 (moving to 5.2 in the next couple of months) but we currently put route statements on the client nodes to ensure they exit out their proper interfaces to access the tsm server(s). Dwight E. Cook Systems Management Integration Professional, Advanced Integrated Storage Management TSM Administration (918) 925-8045 Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: .COMSubject: GIGE connectivity via TSM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 03/23/2004 09:28 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager This should be an easy one for most... I have a Solaris client running TSM v5.2. It will be getting a GIGE card. What is the best/recommended way to ensure data is traversing the GIGE card (in both directions... outbound/inbound) if it is not set up as the default NIC on the client. thx. == If you
exclude questions
Why, in the Backup-Archive Clients Installation and User's Guide v5.2 for Unix does it recommend having the following as a minimum in the backup.excl file. exclude /unix/yet to come across a directory called unix on solaris, aix or linux.. so what do these two unix statements do? exclude.dir /unix/ exclude /.../coreI know what this does And finally, we've implemented the following (//.../*) in a backup.excl list and proven that it does work, however, it's not documented anywhere in the manuals so we don't want to deploy companywide until we get confirmation that there are no adverse effects. The first line excludes any file systems that may be added to a client without our knowledge. However, it was excluding / (root) as well. Note: we put the extra / in front of root, and it now works. Does anyone have any insight? exclude /*/.../* include //.../* 31VER_31DAYS include /var/.../* 31VER_31DAYS include /orabackup/.../* 31VER_31DAYS include /orahome/.../* 31VER_31DAYS include /orapirelarch/.../* 31VER_31DAYS include /app/lzrchk/.../* 31VER_31DAYS exclude /.../core exclude.fs /tmp exclude.fs /etc/mnttab exclude.fs /var/run exclude.fs /dev/fd exclude.fs /etc/mnttab exclude.fs /proc exclude.fs /orapirel01 exclude.fs /orapirel02 exclude.fs /orapirel03 == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ ==
Re: TDPO configuration file locations
Jason, It goes as follows. When initiating a TDP backup, the tdpo.opt file is referenced. That calls the dsm.opt which in turn calls the dsm.sys. The tdpo.opt and the dsm.opt should be in /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64. (just bin if you're not running 64 bit) The dsm.sys has to be in the /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin64 directory. In this directory Break the symlink to /usr/bin. Comment out the Inclexcl statement. Change password access from generate to prompt. I also strongly recommend creating a seperate domain for your database backups as does the manual. Set the management class to 1-0-0-0. You can also set it as the default management class. You should also consider changing the filespace name to something other than adsmorc. In the event that you have multiple oracle instances on the same client, it is much more managable when they each have a unique name. e.g If the database gets put to rest, you can simply delete the filespace for that database. Not so easy if you have 3 or 4 databases all writing to filespace adsmorc. (you set the filespace name in the tdpo.opt file). You will need to create a unique tdpo.opt file for each database. Regarding your question, when is the data going to expire. The answer is NEVER until you run a deletion script. Joe -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harris, Jason (DIS) Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 5:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDPO configuration file locations I use Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle 2.2.1, BA and API client 5.2.0 on Oracle 9.2, Solaris 9. TSM is on Solaris 8. When starting a TDPO channel, the tdpo.conf is referenced. Within tdpo.conf, a dsm.opt is referenced. In documentation, filespace /adsmorc must be bound to correct management class in the dsm.sys file or else the backups will be attached to the policy's default management class. Does anyone know where this dsm.sys should be ? Should it be in the same directory as dsm.opt ? Should it be in the API directory ? TDPO directory ? BA directory ? Our backups are never expiring off of the TSM server, the /adsmorc filespace keeps getting bigger and it should not. Does anyone know how to find out which mgmt class TDPO backups are bound to ? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Jason Harris Enterprise Business Solutions Department of Information Services Voice: (360) 725-5217 Pager: (360) 971-1091 == If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ ==
TDP for Oracle archives failing.
Need a little assistance here... Full backups work, archives do not. Not an oracle guy. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated... OS platform SunOS 5.8 Oracle 8.1.7 TDPv2.2.1 TSM Server V5,2,0.0 running on zOS Here is the message that appears in the tdpoerror.log: 01/10/04 09:28:30 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9720.515063712 was not found on the TSM Server 01/10/04 09:28:30 ANS4994S TDP Oracle SUN ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9720.515063712 was not fou nd on the TSM Server 01/10/04 09:28:31 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9719.515063712 was not found on the TSM Server 01/10/04 09:28:31 ANS4994S TDP Oracle SUN ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9719.515063712 was not fou nd on the TSM Server Here is the message that appears in the RMAN log: RMAN-08504: input archivelog thread=1 sequence=23740 recid=23740 stamp=514931425 RMAN-08013: channel t1: piece 1 created RMAN-08503: piece handle=arch.BFRMDM.9718.515063712 comment=API Version 2.0,MMS Version 2.2.1.0 RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: backup RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel t1 RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19506: failed to create sequential file, name=arch.BFRMDM.9718.515063712, pa rms= ORA-27028: skgfqcre: sbtbackup returned error RMAN-10031: ORA-19624 occurred during call to DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE.BACKUPPIECECREATE Recovery Manager complete. Completed backup using backup_archive.rcv.rcv: Sat Jan 10 09:26:59 EST 2004
ANU2508E wrong write state
Need help... I'm getting this message prior to the TDP for Oracle backup failure. It transmits appx 6G over 3 channels, but then generates the following errors in the tdpoerror.log. I'm not that concerned with the ANU2602E or the ANS4994S, but I am concerned with the ANU2508E. Also, there is very little documentation on the error. We (tsm admins) did not change any configuration on our side, and the DBA's state they made no changes on their side. There is nothing in the actlog to indicate there is a problem. My initial question is, what is in the Wrong write state? And my next question is, how do I resolve? Before I call support, does anyone have any insight? OS platform SunOS 5.8 Oracle 8.1.7 TDPv2.2.1 TSM Server V5,2,0.0 running on zOS 01/10/04 09:26:59 ANU2508E Wrong write state 01/10/04 09:28:30 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9720.515063712 was not found on the TSM Server 01/10/04 09:28:30 ANS4994S TDP Oracle SUN ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9720.515063712 was not fou nd on the TSM Server 01/10/04 09:28:31 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9719.515063712 was not found on the TSM Server 01/10/04 09:28:31 ANS4994S TDP Oracle SUN ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//arch.BFRMDM.9719.515063712 was not fou nd on the TSM Server Regards, Joe
Re: Oracle TDP issues
Are you sure you have the agent.lic file? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Firmes Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Oracle TDP issues The tdpoconf looks fine to me. Am I missing something? Steve C:\TSM\AGENTOBAtdpoconf showenv IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases: Data Protection for Oracle Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1997, 2003. All rights reserved. DATA PROTECTION FOR ORACLE INFORMATION Version: 5 Release: 2 Level:0 Sublevel: 0 Platform: 32bit DP Oracle Win32 TSM SERVER INFORMATION Server Name: DSMSERV Server Address: NOMAR Server Type: Windows Server Port: 1500 Communication Method: TCP/IP SESSION INFORMATION Owner Name: Node Name: Node Type:DP Oracle Win32 DSMI_DIR: C:\TSM\api DSMI_ORC_CONFIG: c:\tsm\agentoba\dsm.opt TDPO_OPTFILE: C:\TSM\AgentOBA\tdpo.opt Password Directory: C:\TSM\AgentOBA\ Compression: FALSE -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 10/30/2003 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Oracle TDP issues Try running tdpoconf showenv on client. If info does not display or is not complete, then you haven't setup tdpo.opt or other files correctly. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/03 09:43AM TSM sever 5.2.1 on win2k Oracle 8.1.7.3 on winnt 4 sp6a rman is running on a different nt4 sp6a machine TSM for Databases - Oracle 5.2.0 is installed on the rman server with ba client 5.1.6.0 when running the rman scripts on the rman server I get these errors: RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: allocate RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel t1 RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-19557: device error, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer ORA-19511: SBT error = 4110, errno = 0, BACKUP_DIR environment variable is not s et RMAN-10031: ORA-19624 occurred during call to DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE.DEVICEALLOCATE Any ideas? Thanks. Steve ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ##
Re: NO tapes!!!
Check to see if migration is working/setup -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan Dinelle Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NO tapes!!! I am still a rookie with TSM... There is no tape backup produced at all since wednesday. We are using the TSM Operational Reporting and nothing showing us that there is a problem... Is there a way to know what exactlty is causing this kind of behavior... We used to have 2-3 tapes to send every day! Now, it is started with 1-2 and nothing at all... Where do I need to check in order to, at least, know what is going on? Stephan
Re: restoring UNIX client data
try -ina (for inactive) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gable, Josh Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: restoring UNIX client data Folks, We are having issues finding the exact syntax needed to restore an entire directory structure and all files contained within, and dsmc ? is no help. The directory we were attempting to restore was the 'test' directory. We have tried the following: dsmc restore /Prod_App/example/test/* /var/tmp/ -subdir=yes dsmc restore /Prod_App/example/test/* /var/tmp/ -subdir=yes dsmc restore /Prod_App/example/test/* /var/tmp/ -subdir=yes And probably several other variations. At best, we were only able to restore 2500 of 7000 files needed. We ended up having to bring up a GUI from the Unix client to properly restore all files. Can anyone help us out? Thanks in advance, Josh Gable EDS Enterprise Storage - Tulsa Backup and Recovery MD 326 4000 North Mingo Road Tulsa, OK 74116-5020
Re: Regarding RMAN restoration using TDP
Did you check mount points on the server side... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas Rupp, Vorarlberger Illwerke AG Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Regarding RMAN restoration using TDP Hi, we are doing (nearly) the same. Offline backup of our ~60GB production DB (Oracle 8.1.7), restore on our customizing system. Backup with 2 channels to 3590 drives. TSM Servers is 4.2.2.8 and TDP is 2.2.1. Backup and restore time are about 1 hour. Is the hardware of your clone different to your production system? I think you should check all components in your setup (CPU, memory, disk I/O, network configuration, TDP config files ..) Try to FTP a big file to this server. If it's faster it could be a TDP problem, otherwise I would check hardware and network. What OS are you running on (W2K, Unix ..)? Thomas Rupp -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Subrahmanyam Gotety [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2003 18:57 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Regarding RMAN restoration using TDP Hi We are using RMAN for backing up our Oracle databases to TAPE through TDP. Our observations are following. 1) Database Size :- 380 GB 2) Backup time thru RMAN :- 4 Hrs 3) Number of channels used :- 4 Channels Problem is when we try to restore the same for cloning purposes the restoration time is around 15 Hours to 24 Hours. Can anyone suggest as to what all are required to reduce the restoration time . Thanks Regards Subbu
Re: Subfile backups (or Adaptive Copy)
What are all of the postst referring to with regard to a base file backup on the 32 iteration of subfile backups -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Krzysztof WOZNIAK Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subfile backups (or Adaptive Copy) -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2003 4:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subfile backups (or Adaptive Copy) snip Is there a method for checking beforehand whether the current backup session is going to be a base or a meta backup? This info would be used to prevent - or at least warn the user to not to use diap-up lines for huge backup sessions. Not an issue - it's not the SESSION that is a base or meta backup, it's at the FILE level. Only the particular FILE that has changed enough since the base backup will start a new base. So it probably won't matter to most users if a few files require a new base. The only thing I know of that will cause the entire session to be a base backup, is deleting the /baclient/cache subdirectory. Base is file-related! This is a bit of understading which I missed. Thank you very much for this explanation It was very helpul. Regards, -- Mr Krzysztof Wozniak,-_|\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edith Cowan University / \ Phone: 61-8-9273 8026 Churchlands WA, 6018 $_,-._/Fax: 61-8-9273 8000 Australia o
Re: Multiple nodenames for Solaris client
Duane, Create a new stanza in your dsm.sys file with a new Servername and new nodename. e.g. SE=another_server (have it resolve to the same TCPP you'd normally go to) nodename=another_node (call it whatever the name of your new client is) Then you start a second scheduler as follows: ./dsmc sched -se=another_server Now you're new node is associated with the above scheduler. Grep for dsmc and ensure that both your scheduler daemons are running. Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ochs, Duane Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multiple nodenames for Solaris client Hi All, I have a Solaris client that needs to perform a couple of different backup/archive schedules. I would like to use multiple schedulers. For my WIN clients I just use different opt files with different nodenames for the archive and backup schedules. Can I perform the same with Solaris ? If so, how ? TSM Server 5.2.1.1 (AIX) TSM Client 5.2 (Solaris) Thanks, Duane Ochs Enterprise Computing Quad/Graphics Inc Sussex, Wisconsin 414-566-2375 phone
lan free installation doc
Can anyone point me in the general direction of steps required for a Lan Free installation and customization? Sun client TSMv5.2. Z/os server TSMv5,1,6.1. thx.
TCP/IP NAME TCP/IP ADDRESS
Need a little assistance on this. I issue q node f=d from the server side for a NODE_A, I get a TCP/IP NAME and TCP/IP ADDRESS that are incorrect (say NODE_B). At some point I may have connected virtually w/ the TCP/IP NAME (NODE_B) that I'm seeing, but even after I connect from the local host, NODE_A, the TCP/IP NAME and TCP/IP ADDRESS still reflect NODE_B's information. I've seen this on a few instances. What drew this to my attention is the fact that I had 8 sessions started for one archive on NODE_A and no resource definition in the dsm.sys. When I checked the dsm.sys on NODE_B, lo and behold, resource utilization is set to 10. What am I missing? Server Platform Z/os running TSM Server v5,1,6.1 NODE_A Client Platform Sun2.8 running BAclient TSMv4,2,2.1 NODE_B Client Platform Sun2.8 running BAclient TSMv4,2,1.0 Any help would be greatly appreciated. thx.
TSM managed services
Can anyone share some info on TSM managed services to address a Unix memory leak. i.e. have dsmcad start scheduler prior to backup and stop it after backup. My understanding is that the memory leak is actually a short coming of the Unix operating system architecture. Apparently the scheduler aquires memory and does not release it. Who recommends managed services? I'd like to hear. thx.
Re: Saving data on a defective cartridge
A little off the subject, and I already heard Richard Simms view on not having a second copy... but what are most shops doing with respect to a second copy. I'm in a pretty large shop and upper management, in a cost savings effort, wants us to turn off the creation of a second tape copy. I'm not too comfortable with the idea. What are your thoughts? -Original Message- From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Saving data on a defective cartridge Try doing a move data to get the data off of the tape. If I find I am starting to have problems I usually do a: update vol VOLUMENAME acc=reado move data VOLUMENAME This should move all data that is recoverable from the volume to another volume in the same storage pool. I then eject the offending volume and check it for apparent physical issues. Then the part I hate: delete vol VOLUMENAME discarddata=yes Sometimes I am able to re-label the volume and use it again. But typically it gets moved to a less critical use, returned to the vendor for a new tape [my preferred method], or degaused and distroyed by a certified vendor [least preferred, paying to have it thrown away]. If anyone has a better method, please let me know! ... JC -Original Message- From: Gerhard Rentschler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Saving data on a defective cartridge Hello, I forgot to mention that because of lack of resources I can't afford a copypool for the backup files. I have one for the archives. Best regards Gerhard --- Gerhard Rentschleremail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Computing Center tel. ++49/711/685 5806 University of Stuttgart fax: ++49/711/682357 Allmandring 30a D 70550 Stuttgart Germany -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juan Manuel Lopez Azanon Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Saving data on a defective cartridge Disaster recovery management: Restore it from outside volumes from copy stgpool
another problems with TSMv5.2 client install.
Trying to install TSM client v5.2 on Sun v2.8, 32 bit architecture. The install is laying down the 64 bit TIVsmCapi rather than the 32 bit TIVsmCapi. Upon starting the client, via dsmc, the following error gets generated: libCrun.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Has anyone seen this, and if so, what have you done to work around it other than installing TSMv4.xx
Problem after upgrade TSMclientV5.2.0 on Solaris 2.6/2.8
Currently in the process of upgrading from TSM client v4.2.1 to TSM client v5.2.0 on Sun 2.6 and Sun 2.8. Although the backup schedules appear to be running without incident, (i.e. no error messages and nothing odd in the dsmsched.log or dsmerror.log) if I log into the client and issue dsmc q fi, the last incremental date is the date in which we upgraded to TSMv5.2.0. Scheduled backups have, however, successfully executed since then. I did some further testing. I created a new file on /, and ran dsmc incr. The new file does not get backed up. However, if I run dsmc incr /, the file does get backed up. Can anyone shed any light on this. Help would be greatly appreciated as I've rolled this out to production servers and can not afford to go much longer without knowing my backups are valid. thx
Re: Problems with TSM on Linux Server
fyi... you can upgrade that to Redhat version 8 and you'll see better performance. -Original Message- From: Patrick Boutilier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with TSM on Linux Server Mark, We run TSM server 5.1.6.5 on RedHat 7.2 with 2.4.9-31 kernel without any problems. Mark Farber wrote: Hi TSM'rs Being a Linux bigot, I managed to convince a new client to opt for a Linux TSM server over Windows. I am now starting to wish I had just gone for Windows. Unless you can help I might have to. Here's the problem. Server Version 5.2.0.2 on Redhat 9 Client Version 5.1.6.2 on Redhat 7.3 The TSM server has no tape library or drive but is totally file based (400GB using software raid0) Client backups are done via the crontab using /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc incr The server just hangs during a client backup operation.nothing in the activity report. Eventually the client times out but unfortunately the dsmc incr stays in the process queue. The next day, cron dutifully fires off another backup and so it goes. Eventually after a call from a frustrated customer, I have to start the server manually and run the backup manually. (Seriously not good!!) Also, if a backup is running and you happen to do one too many q act requests, the server hangs. By the way, only the TSM application hangs, not Linux itself. Has anyone experience with Linux TSM server and seen similar problems? Regards Mark
Client install problem
O/S Solaris 2.8 (32bit) Installed TDP client v 5.2 and v5.1.56 Install is installing the 64 bit version of the API Why? When DSMC starts it gets a fatal error: libCrun.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory. Any help, trying to keep away from v4 client as it's going off support. Regards, Joe
GIGE revisited
Server: TSMv5,1,6.1 running on MVS Client: TSMv5,1,5.6 running on Solaris v5.8 Multiple NICs Trying to force client to use specific NIC (GIGE). I've specified TCPCLIENTADDRESS in the dsm.sys file, stopped and started the deamon (for giggles) and then logged into the TSM server. When I issue the command q node x f=d, the TCP/IP Address shows up as the old fast ethernet address. Any suggestions/help. Regards, Joe
Re: GIGE revisited
Two completeley different networks. -Original Message- From: Tom Kauffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GIGE revisited What is the network address on the GigE, and on the old ethernet? If they're both on the same network, TCP/IP will ship packets out on the low-numbered host-address interface, IIRC. To use two NICs you need to have two networks. My primary SAP DB server has a bundle -- backup1 GigE192.168.194.62 255.255.255.0 backup2 GigE192.168.195.62 255.255.255.0 public 100Mb 10.8.224.25255.255.0.0 admin 100Mb 192.168.193.62 255.255.255.0 private 100Mb 192.168.192.62 255.255.255.0 These are all seperate networks (and I have a few more -- hacmp standby adapters, on two more networks); traffic does not route between any of them, and I have no problems using the gig-e for backup/restore. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GIGE revisited Server: TSMv5,1,6.1 running on MVS Client: TSMv5,1,5.6 running on Solaris v5.8 Multiple NICs Trying to force client to use specific NIC (GIGE). I've specified TCPCLIENTADDRESS in the dsm.sys file, stopped and started the deamon (for giggles) and then logged into the TSM server. When I issue the command q node x f=d, the TCP/IP Address shows up as the old fast ethernet address. Any suggestions/help. Regards, Joe
Re: TSM on Mainframe
Once a month... too often. -Original Message- From: Wayne T. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe Though I'm not advocating someone install TSM or TSM on a mainframe, I'll offer that we don't IPL our mainframe very often. Here's the output of a command I just entered ... q cplevel VM/ESA Version 2 Release 3.0, service level 9803 Generated at 07/09/98 12:19:20 EST IPL at 03/18/01 07:17:35 EST But then the mainframe isn't as big as some of our Linux/AIX/Solaris servers. ;-) cheers, wayne
Re: TSM on Mainframe
Brian, In my situation, I'm getting charged for MIPS usage on the mainframe as well as staff employees that support the mainframe. The tape issue turns out to be a wash for us since we'd use the same tape libs. DASD you're paying for in either case. We did the same exact eval that you're doing right now. Initially it seemed like a no brainer. We had spare MIPS on the frame and figured, why not use them. Once we started using them, the complaints/bills started flying. Complaints due to the large amount of MIPS TSM consumes, the bill for the MIPS usage. Even though they're spare MIPS, we still get charged for them (again, internal funny money). Money aside, the staffing and maintenance schedule is enough to keep me off the mainframe. But, as always, each decision has to be based on your companies core competencies, budget and hardware availability. And finally, If I were starting from scratch, AIX implementation hands down. Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: Brian L. Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe Not exactly. We are currently running TSM 4.2.1.9 on a 9672-R44 running OS/390 2.10 and we have been doing an evaluation on moving TSM from OS/390 on to AIX. While the cost of the AIX hardware is relatively cheap we still need to incur DASD costs in the form of SAN and Tape costs, not to mention the need to develop cron jobs on AIX to handle tape processing , on OS/390 you do not have to define volumes, drives or the library to TSM. Also we found that the licensing costs of TSM itself on AIX were actually higher than the mainframe costs. Granted we are tied into tape media (STK 9840) and our management is not looking to replace that media but even if we did the cost is still slightly higher for us on AIX. Brian L. Nick Systems Technician - Storage Solutions The Phoenix Companies Inc. 100 Bright Meadow Blvd Enfield CT. 06082-1900 E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE: (860)403-2281 Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: GE.ML.COM Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU 04/03/03 03:10 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Bad... total cost of ownership is too high. Too many fingers in the pie (tape group, dasd group, TCPIP group, operations etc... When you begin to figure out total cost of ownership, you have to add all of these support teams into the equation, not to mention the internal charge (funny money) for MIPS usage on the mainframe that you'll incur. TSM will also be at the mercy of the mainframe IPL schedule as well, which typically is on Saturday night into Sunday morning (a window that you really want open for your large archives or db backups) If you're on any other platform, your costs should drop significantly. e.g. If you have a P690, you have 1 SA managing that server. You don't need nearly the staff that you'd require for a mainframe solution. How often does an AIX or Sun machine have to be taken down for maintenance? (not often). And finally, a P690's I/O is comparable to a mainframes. If you get the budget, go with a big Unix system. Run screaming from the mainframe solution. You'll save a lot of headaches and meetings. Just my opinion. Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: Spearman, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe We do. It works fine for us, but we are migrating off to Unix for D.R. reasons. -Original Message- From: LeBlanc, Patricia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM on Mainframe Does anyone out there use TSM on a mainframe? Good? Bad? Indifferent?? Thanks!! pattie This message and any included attachments are from NOVANT HEALTH INC. and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail. Thank you.
Re: TSM on Mainframe
Bad... total cost of ownership is too high. Too many fingers in the pie (tape group, dasd group, TCPIP group, operations etc... When you begin to figure out total cost of ownership, you have to add all of these support teams into the equation, not to mention the internal charge (funny money) for MIPS usage on the mainframe that you'll incur. TSM will also be at the mercy of the mainframe IPL schedule as well, which typically is on Saturday night into Sunday morning (a window that you really want open for your large archives or db backups) If you're on any other platform, your costs should drop significantly. e.g. If you have a P690, you have 1 SA managing that server. You don't need nearly the staff that you'd require for a mainframe solution. How often does an AIX or Sun machine have to be taken down for maintenance? (not often). And finally, a P690's I/O is comparable to a mainframes. If you get the budget, go with a big Unix system. Run screaming from the mainframe solution. You'll save a lot of headaches and meetings. Just my opinion. Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: Spearman, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM on Mainframe We do. It works fine for us, but we are migrating off to Unix for D.R. reasons. -Original Message- From: LeBlanc, Patricia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM on Mainframe Does anyone out there use TSM on a mainframe? Good? Bad? Indifferent?? Thanks!! pattie This message and any included attachments are from NOVANT HEALTH INC. and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail. Thank you.
Re: Remote clients transferring GBs over WAN
Wanda, Do you have that implemented on file servers as well? Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote clients transferring GBs over WAN We use subfile backup even on local desktops, works great. Cut our daily load by about 30%. -Original Message- From: John Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote clients transferring GBs over WAN From 4.1 onwards there is Adaptive sub-file backup for Mobile Clients. I don't use it or know much about it but I think it allows you to backup the changed bytes/blocks of a file on a laptop rather than the whole changed file. This may be of some use to you depending on the data they are backing up. Cheers John Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: To: ADSM-L ADSM: Dist Stor Managercc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote clients transferring GBs over WAN IST.EDU 26-Mar-2003 13:17 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] IST.EDU The organization I work for has four main establishments. Typically, someone will go on mission to another establishment and perform a backup of his laptop. Since his dsm.opt points to a server that that is hundreds, if not, thousands of kilometers away, this backup will be done over the WAN and not the usual LAN. Occasionally, this user might even attempt to backup 1 or 2 GBs over the WAN. This obviously causes some problems. What to do about this? Blocking the port in the firewall comes to mind but that is not a real answer. Has anybody encountered this problem and what, if anything, did you do? Thank you... Such backups have to be painful for the laptop user as well. I should think that following the procedures outlined in the Windows client manual under Performing a backup with limited bandwidth should yield relief. There is a whitepaper on the IBM site describing it in fuller detail. Richard Sims, BU
EMC Symmetrix ?
Need help!!! I currently have 2 identical servers using EMC Symmetrix. Since the apps and data are identical on both servers, how do I prevent backing up the data on both of these servers as either can be the primary at any given time? Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Joe
Re: EMC Symmetrix ?
Sorry for the confusion... these are clients that I don't want backing up double the data to TSM. -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EMC Symmetrix ? If I understand ur question ,u want to have both TSM Server up but only one TSM active any given time with automated script schedule.Then. Disable client schedules .If I am correct there is a command by which we can disable all schedules on TSM server.If u don't want to shut down TSM server. Balanand Pinni -Original Message- From: Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EMC Symmetrix ? Need help!!! I currently have 2 identical servers using EMC Symmetrix. Since the apps and data are identical on both servers, how do I prevent backing up the data on both of these servers as either can be the primary at any given time? Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Joe
Comparison doc
Almost hate to ask... I know it's been discussed, but can anyone point me to a recent TSM vs Legato document? Need it fast Thanks in advance. Regards, Joe
Select for tapes mounted for a retrieve operation
Hello all I'm looking for a select statement that will give me the volumes that were used for a retrieve operation. Any help would be greatley appreciated. Regards, Joe
