DIS: Ruleset?
Hey crew I was looking at the nomic wiki, which lists this website for more info (which I get a 404 at): http://www.iki.fi/scurra/agora.html I was also looking at agoranomic.org, and I didn't see anything immediately... so where is the agora ruleset? Peter On 12/29/06, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:22:30PM -0800, Jonathan Fry wrote: I'm not sure what criteria you used to make this list, but I can think of a couple of other active nomics that might be worth consideration: Nomopoly http://q17.cjb.net/nomopoly5/index No fair! This one doesn't become active until next year! Also, didn't Ackanomic die a long, long time ago? Yes. But I've met a former Ackan in person, and I can't say that for other non-Agoran nomics (I met one Agoran in person, but that was years before I goaded em into playing). -- C. Maud Image (Michael Slone) some things are lost and others gained -- Andre, in agora-discussion
Re: DIS: Ruleset?
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:01:46AM -0800, Peter Conerly wrote: I was looking at the nomic wiki, which lists this website for more info (which I get a 404 at): http://www.iki.fi/scurra/agora.html Yes, that's rather out of date. I was also looking at agoranomic.org, and I didn't see anything immediately... so where is the agora ruleset? Michael Norrish's copy of the ruleset is available at: http://axiom.anu.edu.au/~michaeln/agora/short-ruleset . There is also a (partially) wikified version available at http://agora.lendemaindeveille.com/index.php/List_of_rules_by_category . -- C. Maud Image (Michael Slone) some things are lost and others gained -- Andre, in agora-discussion
DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ
Sherlock wrote: R2110 (Win by Paradox) limits the number of wins to one person, but does not limit the number of wins that individual may achieve for noting a paradox. Murphy therefore was eligible to receive any number of wins that the Speaker decided to award. Rule 2110/0 (Power=3) Win by Paradox If the legality of an action cannot be determined with finality, or if by a Judge's best reasoning, not appealed within a week of eir Judgement, an action appears equally legal and illegal, then the Speaker shall award the Patent Title of Champion to the first Player to publicly note that condition. The Herald shall record that this Title was achieved by paradox in eir report. My interpretation is that X shall perform action Y is equivalent to X is required and allowed to perform Y exactly once, unless clearly indicated otherwise.
