Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, omd wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Benjamin Schultz > wrote: > > Otherwise the Root is its own Parent. > > Makes sense if you envision it as a Unix filesystem. Root = own parent was on purpose. Not sure if that screws up any tree math assumptions, but I didn't see any harm in making it so. The real bug (feature?) I noticed is that, as written, two (or more) rules can be each others' parents and detached from the root. -G. (remembering the Switch Switch).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > Otherwise the Root is its own Parent. Makes sense if you envision it as a Unix filesystem.
DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Create the following Rule, The Olive Tree, Power=1: > >Every existing Rule (every Child) has an existing Rule as a >Parent. The lowest numbered existing Rule is the Root. The >default parent for all children is the Root. > I think this needs an EXCEPT clause. Something like: The lowest numbered existing Rule is the Root. Every existing Rule except the Root has an existing Rule as a Parent, and is a Child of its Parent. The default parent for all children is the Root. Otherwise the Root is its own Parent. And as this is intended to be a tree growing upwards, one cannot go Below the Root. OscarMeyr, making an obscure reference.
